• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

“The Sensible Sound” magazine the ASR forum of pre-internet days?

Peter Aczel took no prisoners. If he thought a piece of gear was overrated or snake oil, he let the reader know in no uncertain terms.
True - but he undercut himself very badly when he took subscriber money (asked for long term subscriptions) to invest in a speaker (Fourier One) whose product he gave rave reviews despite by most accounts sucking (never heard it myself), and didn't publish his magazine for over two years.
 
@Gorgonzola has got it right: Audio Critic was subjective for much of it's existence, but at some point, Peter Aczel "got science", and it's those science-minded issues which have been preserved and made freely available.

Thank you, @JeffS7444 .

I never subscribed to Audio Critic but only picked up the odd edition at the newstand. All the additions that I recall reading were purely subject. But now checking later editions in the archive, obviously there was a point where speakers were tested, etc.

Nevertheless I respected what I read and respected Aczel's and other reviewers' subjective opinions even when I took them with a grain of salt. Above, I mentioned a couple of instances when I acted on reviews. Clearly at no point did Aczel have any special respect for "high end", expensive equipment.

There was an extended phase of my life where I paid essentially no attention to audio. This hiatus was an era where small kid and a tight budgets distracted me, roughly 1992-2002 -- which included ALL later editions of Audio Critic where Aczel started doing testing.

Despite not catching in the Fall 2000 edition, I eventually became aware of Aczel's "10 Biggest Lies in Audio", circa maybe 2005. I remember subscribing to most of them immediately, in particular the Cable Lie and the Antidigital Lie.
 
Back
Top Bottom