Search results

  1. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    There are powerful skeptical arguments that can introduce doubt into any epistemic system. Does that mean we should consider such arguments? Perhaps for the purpose of philosophical navel gazing, it can be a valuable intellectual exercise to take a look at the limits of statistics and...
  2. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Looks like they also have regular plain headphone cables that are over 10K: https://www.kimber.com/customize/axios-16-ag
  3. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Do Political Scientists conduct experiments in labs with white coats on?
  4. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    True. Audioscience on the other hand...
  5. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    At least take the time to burn yo shit in!!!
  6. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    s Yes.
  7. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Bad schtick by my standards, except I would disagree ASR deserves better class of troll considering the number of quotes and responses and time it took for anyone to even realize it was schtick. See following:
  8. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

  9. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Yeah bro. Just do "probably average hearing" but can easily hear distortion at or beyond the range known to be audible to any existing human.
  10. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    When you are responding to someone running pure schtick under the moniker "low iq audiophile with golden ears", and completely agreeing with and approving of what they are saying and actually QUOTING IT that is when you need to take a step back and....just sayin. and in case you delete:
  11. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Sure and people go to work every day for 12 hours "voluntarily" as well.
  12. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    LOL. TY brother :)
  13. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    IMO, if you don't understand the equations, you don't understand electrodynamics. And there are few people who aren't physics, math or EE majors that have the mathematical background to understand any of that stuff. And most of the people who have the ability to learn that stuff, wouldn't have...
  14. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Anyone who believes in audiophoolery will do anything they can to avoid such an experience. Some people just love to live under a veil of ignorance. Might work for people who already have a decent math/science education, but for most audiphools, forcing them to have a "DBT experience" isn't...
  15. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    lol at someone who thinks who thinks there are sound differences between cables self-learning electromagnetism.
  16. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    I'm guessing you didn't read the rest of this thread.
  17. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    There are people with better hearing than you who understand that there isn't an audible difference between dacs. Do you also think that the digital to analog circuitry in your DVD player makes movies look better than other DVD players playing movies on the same TV? Just curious. Also are you...
  18. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    For audible sound? No, it isn't as good as it gets because there are other things that actually change the audible sound like the pair of headphones you choose. But can people "hear the difference in sound" between the dac in a MacBook Pro and the dac in something like a benchmark dac 3? No...
  19. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    Yes, they would measure differently, because machines are capable of making measurements below the threshold that humans can hear.
  20. Willhelm_Scream

    Serious Question: How can DAC's have a SOUND SIGNATURE if they measure as transparent? Are that many confused?

    The usual examples of science being wrong (like the geocentric worldview "science" used to hold), were theories that were in no way disprovable at the time, much in the same way that string theory cannot be readily disproved at this time. The physics and electrical engineering that can prove...
Top Bottom