Search results

  1. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    Yes, but what if it becomes too analytical? Clinical even? We can't have that..
  2. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    The more torches, the more enlightening ha ha..
  3. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    Let them light as many torches as they like. Truth always prevails in the end. I lost time and money buying into the 'extra long tap' narrative. I ended up learning more about myself and how it is indeed possible to have everyone around you deceived and self-deluded. This lesson also transfers...
  4. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    Only if you burn them in the correct direction. Otherwise the electrons don't line up properly (yes, I've heard that too!)
  5. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    I am prepared to give Rob the benefit of the doubt on this one. Our understanding of the brain is primitive and we have no proof that his claim is incorrect. ...But neither do we have any proof (or even indication!) that the claim is correct. Nobody has managed to pick up any of these nuances...
  6. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    That's what they were telling me on HeadFi, to wait until it 'beds in', listen for a couple of weeks with MScaler and then take it off and feel the loss of magic. And I tried it like an idiot, that's how desperate I was to make a case for the MScaler in my system. All this delay achieved was to...
  7. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    After watching Rob answer the carefully-phrased questions I know which way I'm leaning on now.. Reminded me a bit of the prince Andrew interview:facepalm:
  8. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    So why on earth did he fit a level-matched bypass button on the remote? If he was knowingly misleading/misrepresenting, that would be the last thing he would fit on the MScaler. I've spent *many* hours investigating the 'tap' business and now I've got useless spare BNC cables and ferrites lying...
  9. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    I think it is important to note that Rob Watts went to the effort to add the fair comparison functionality by equalising the levels. It certainly shows his confidence in the before/after results. Just because I cannot hear any difference, doesn't mean that others don't think they can. It must...
  10. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    I have tried blind tests with 192/24 recordings scaled down all the way. I admit that I cannot tell the difference from redbook upwards (when *everything* else is the same!) I can tell (with difficulty sometimes though) the difference from 320kbs MP3 to 44/16, but from then upwards nope! Of...
  11. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    It was received in the lines of I was doing something wrong, that it was my fault. I really gave it the benefit of the doubt, studying the theory Rob Watts claims, which still registers as legit with me. But I still couldn't hear any difference. I even replaced the panels of my Martin Logan...
  12. J

    CHORD M-Scaler Review (Upsampler)

    I had the MScaler for 5 weeks at home during the so-called pandemic along with the Chord QuTest (supports dual-BNC 768KHz) For the life of me I could not hear any difference whatsoever at any level of upscaling. No depth increase, no soundstage widening, nothing. Tried different recordings...
  13. J

    Distortion down to -300 dB, what exactly does that mean physically?

    I mentioned it because both claims come from the same crowd in the same context. Maybe there is something into the claims, and not just plain old-fashioned expectation bias. ..I hope..
  14. J

    Distortion down to -300 dB, what exactly does that mean physically?

    So are all these 'high-tap' people definitely deluding themselves? And where would the threshold of audibility be? 100, 1000 taps? How far the Nyquist-Shannon way do we need to go for any trained listener to be imposible to discern any further improvement? It would be damn useful to have a...
  15. J

    Distortion down to -300 dB, what exactly does that mean physically?

    There is a reference to -350db from the PGGB guys https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/62699-a-toast-to-pggb-a-heady-brew-of-math-and-magic/page/23/#comments "the noise shaper PGGB uses for 16FS signal to noise shape output signal to 32bits has a noise floor below -350dB in the audible...
  16. J

    Distortion down to -300 dB, what exactly does that mean physically?

    Good point, the 300+ db refer to Verilog simulations. Shouldn't such simulations account for thermal noise?
  17. J

    this is soooo High End audio..

    If I have to be critical, the edges are perhaps a bit too sharp, but I prefer the texture. It's more 'meaty' Subtle, but in-yer-face. Hard to put into words, you have to *feel* it.
  18. J

    this is soooo High End audio..

    https://www.italy24news.com/entertainment/news/13000.html Beats Seinfeld's "show about nothing" by a long shot.. Audio equivalent: More air between the instruments, more musical yet less resolving, warm but sterile. Night and day difference.
  19. J

    Distortion down to -300 dB, what exactly does that mean physically?

    I don't think the context of >300db was SPL that killed the dinosaurs My understanding of Rob's musings is that he suspects the brain can perform weirdly accurate extrapolations from the rough data the ears let through, leading to differences in perception. So he claims anyone can hear the...
Top Bottom