Search results for query: AutoEQ

Misinformation on many levels. First, The preference scores on the AutoEQ Ranking page are referencing Harman IE 2019 for IEMs, nothing else. Only the separate EQ presets are using a lightly modified Harman target, which is fine. Automatic EQ doesn't become more reliable just for adhering to a...

Hey all, I was wondering if anyone could give me some tips on measuring IEMs/earbuds for use with AutoEQ.app I have a dayton imm-6, and i saw that its quite common to use that and a tube to get measurements for not too much money. I don't need the measurement to be perfect, just good enough...

I would also be very interested to know that! :D Besides the target, the question is also about what AutoEQ optimization parameters they use. I suspect sniffing the web traffic between the App/Cr Extension and AutoEQ would show how Qudelix “queries” the AutoEQ website, but haven’t had the...

"AutoEq part"?

I believe the black table you quote is the same as from the preferred profiles on the github autoeq pages https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq/tree/master/results albeit with the filters differently ordered. Not the autoeq app. For over ears I believe jaako has set the magic to match a...

It defaults to 5128 inspired target, which is called AutoEQ in-ear. /tree/master/targets/

& @NielsMayer The AutoEQ profiles are to a bass-light version of Harman, it's the worst of all worlds. AutoEQ software is great and you can EQ to whatever target you like then, not just the one (rather weird) choice the author of AutoEQ made.

Are you sure? Here is an example with "1Custom02", the first one in the AutoEQ list: Q5K SPK PEQ: In AutoEQ, selecting Qudelix 5K as the target equalizer App and everything else as "default",I got: AutoEQ Harman In-Ear 2019: AutoEQ Harman over-ear 2018: They are not exactly the same...

Crinacle AutoEQ: which “target” are you referring to in AutoEQ?

What's the default target for AutoEQ preset in Qudelix? Can we change the default target chosen for headphone's measurements from the AutoEQ DB to something else?

Thanks for clarifying! I didn't know that... The black table I included above is what the Qudelix App/Cr Ext. loads from AutoEQ. It is indeed the preferred profiles from the result folder in @jaakkopasanen Github page.

As already suggested you may want to have a look into the collected measurments of AutoEq (https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq / https://autoeq.app/ ) and try its suggested EQ settings. If you want you can also use my FreqRespGraph (https://github.com/rwhomeaudio/FreqRespGraph) to compare...

Okay, I tried the Oratory PEQs and with similar bass and treble shelf settings, they sound pretty much the same to me with the AutoEQ settings.

I noticed that @jaakkopasanen has added "Moondrop FreeDSP" as equalizer app. option in AutoEQ. Great !!! .......Except that the "AutoEQ" part has not been implemented yet :(. Work in progress? EDIT: it does work!

It is not about the target, it is about the measured FR. We are speculating about the possibility of a stealth revision who has a FR with much less treble, which makes all the EQ profiles overly dark.

Have you tried playing with REW's AutoEQ settings? https://www.minidsp.com/applications/digital-room-correction/rew-autoeq

...https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq/blob/master/results/oratory1990/over-ear/HIFIMAN%20HE400se/README.md https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq/blob/master/results/Kuulokenurkka/over-ear/HIFIMAN%20HE400se/README.md...

Believe it's Harman target with a couple of dB reduction to that in the bass shelf. Don't believe you can change that in devices /apps that use those eq profiles.

Beauty, thank you kindly.

Yes, they are, thanks. They were all pulled from AutoEQ, so it's no bother to re-download into the SPK PEQ list. I will have to re-enter impedance and sensitivity for each setting as this is not pulled from AutoEQ and has been lost from the settings preserved for 20 band PEQ.