Search results

I thought the whole point of kef speakers were because most of the reflected sound sounds the same as direct, it shouldn't matter that much because directivity of the speaker is really good????????

These have been out of stock for a very very long time now, they won't be coming back, shame as I would have loved 4 of these for small atmos speakers.

Many thanks, that's a wild looking chart, guess I'm better off making sure they are at 30 degrees for the mlp.

the 2cr looks to be identical other the the 16mm (0.6in.) Aluminium dome tweeter and smaller depth, the 130qr has a 19mm (0.75in.) Aluminium dome tweeter, not sure if this makes any difference at all, this is much easier to understand though, looks like be stay within 40 degrees.

yes please.

How would I go about reading the beamwidth charts on the kef speakers https://assets.kef.com/documents/ciseries/Ci130QR-EDIT-NO-CROPS.pdf that suggests that these speakers have 130 degress of coverage which I find hard to believe. have no idea what the polar charts mean either. I am currently...

Mine did when I measured pointing straight forward and then facing right in the exact same position, both variations had different peaks and nulls.

Is this for the q4 meta? no reviews or measurements anywhere for it and I'm waiting to see if I could pair it with an r2 meta for l/r duties.

Didn't feel like I had a choice. If I go for a x0.7 angle which puts it at 55degree angle it only places them at 5t apart 30inches behind me and my sofa if 6ft long. I am going to have one last measure tomorrow at that 55 and see if anything changes.

Not sure how far off axis I am but I was aiming for a 50 degree angle from mlp. I thought coax would have a much wider dispersion. I did another measurement to see if moving the mic back a fair bit to what looks like much more on axis but it still seems to measure the same, not sure what is...

So I recently changed my rear atmos speakers to xtz atmosphere s2. I had very small sat speakers (monitor audio mass sat gen 2) up there before. There looks to be a -15db dip at 5k? to about 10k. What has caused this? Its an identical dip for the top rear left and right speaker The first photo...

I don't think it matters for kef because their horizontal and vertical are often nearly the same because of the coaxial. I could be completely wrong however.

Interesting, the vertical looks better then the horizontal.

For the q4 meta which one is vertical and horizontal dispersion? One looks to be 60 degrees and one is 40degrees? would that be why the listening window is so close to the on axis measurement, because of the high dispersion. seriously considering swapping my cinema m6 for these as I already...

You have mixed kef with .................. kef though. I have not.

Wouldn't really know, people of people in here that have listened to a lot that should be a able to help.

the highlighted one is the center. Would the area between 1k - 2k be the problem? the rest seems fairly even

I am currently running a kef r2 meta with some left/right xtz cinema m6's. Was very happy with the sound either using xt32 with a 1k curtain and now using a1 evo, until last night when I watched the revenant again for the first time since release. This a a film that has a lot of voice panning...

Assuming you are selling the r2c to recoup some of the costs I would still say that even at 1100 its still not worth the upgrade, sure it measures great but whether its all that audible of not is up to you.

l actually went with the xtz cinema m6 as they can be used on stand or wall mounted so very flexible. Very happy with my choice. I had the arendals and couldnt justify the costs after hearing the xtz m6 as they were very similar sounding. the arendals got better when cranking the volume but I...