Search results

  1. H

    Actual Double Blind Studies

    Maybe so. I've certainly been trying to do more investigation on my own and AES is new to me so I'll explore it more, especially the free sections. There is a lot there that I may have glossed over on first look. But my point about people making comments without citations still stands. It is a...
  2. H

    Actual Double Blind Studies

    If you mean the post with the Dr. Toole’s recommendation then I did read it and investigated quite a bit. I’ve wanted that book for a while, though it is $90 which is a lot for me. The AES database mentioned looks super interesting, but again is a paid service. $33 per report. Also, an AES...
  3. H

    Actual Double Blind Studies

    Thanks. I'll dig in. I see the first comment is that it would be fun to build a master list. Did anyone ever do so? I guess I'll read and find out. :D
  4. H

    Actual Double Blind Studies

    It does seem that double blind tests would be hard to implement and therefore rare or hard to have as useful. The problem is, so many people point to them as if there is some master database of double blind studies that show what they want it to show. I just want to see those studies or else...
  5. H

    Actual Double Blind Studies

    Thanks. I'm a longtime lurker. :D I checked (again just now) on the first five threads for that search. One of them has an actual double blind test and it is done in his space with a dozen or maybe 15 persons. He runs through a list of problems with his tests. As you go down the list, more and...
  6. H

    Actual Double Blind Studies

    I just read yet another person trying to defend a position related to audio by referencing "double blind studies" generally. The idea always sounds great as a listening test. Truly see if people are able to notice differences between things. If we use a fairly controlled method, this information...
Back
Top Bottom