Search results

Yes. I use it to drive my Yamaha HS3 on my Bed and it works like a charm

I had some issues when directly using the USB Port on my PC, but after using one of those silencer things (a very cheap 20 buck thing from amazon) the issue is gone for me. I can neither measure any distortion nor hear.

That is impossible. When you use the Balanced Output, both CS43131 are used for the balanced output. That means there is nothing left to feed the 3.5mm Output. And the other way around. If you would use one CS43131 for the 3.5mm, there would be only one left for the 4.4mm which needs two. So...

Did anyone measure the output impedance of the DAWN PRO? I wonder why Moondrop is not stating it in the specifications.

First and foremost, about the flat discussion, Yamaha officially provides the frequency response So their expected frequency response is known at the time of buying. But, and this is important (as it seems that nobody in this thread seem to use them correct) this speaker is for near-field...

In my experience, its much harder to make Headphones sound flat than IEM. Probably because they usually only use one single driver and have to cover 20Hz to 20kHz with that driver + make the whole range sound flat. But there are quite a few that sound flat enough, for example the Sennheiser HD...

Because this came up in another thread/context, i wanted to add a big disclaimer here. You can 'not' make an IEM sound Flat/Accurate by AutoEQ to my target, that is not how the target is intended to work and no measurement is correct enough, that this will work. The intention of this target...

I have no idea to be honest. I always download the FR Graphs from the other ones and import them to hangout to use them there. I assume (just guessing) i need to add more points. If you look at the target, its rather simple and i assume i just have to add more frequencies (even if they contain...

That is a tough question. As they are intended to be used by musicians, they are usually not available at such price points. One of the cheaper ones that fit the target pretty well is the Shure SE535 depending on the country you life in, it might be available quite cheap. It could be...

This curve was created exclusively for IEM and i am pretty sure it can't be used for headphones out of the box. Before telling you which IEM hits this target best, big disclaimer! It is important that insertion depth and lot of things matter unrelated to the measured frequency response. Graphs...

I am not sure if "correct" is the right word^^ in my experience, earphone are usually tuned with an intention and they are supposed to sound the way they sound^^ The Target is not finished yet, i am still working on it but you can download the current status here...

In a completely different context, i just recently had an message conversation with Dave where i was told, that this peak from the MACH 80 is not fitting the reference. In this single area, this peak, makes the 80 diverge from reference and the Mach 60 is actually closer to reference in this...

That is correct. But to be fair, it would be insanely hard to find the "truth" with IEM. A lot of Studios (especially in Japan) use the VE7, MACH 80 (or other IEM, but in my experience, these are the most common) for their daily work and use them to replace speakers. But that doesn't mean that...

Using this guide, i was able to create an Target i can use just fine on Crinacles on site, but nowhere else. For example Super*Reviews (squig.link) and VSG both say, "Parse frequence response file failed: invalid format." but no further information about what is wrong and why. Just "Doesn't...

I created my own target based on the experience with Studio Reference IEM, i posted the result on Head-Fi but i t hink its as relevant here (if it is allowed to post something from head-fi here. Yes... i know what kind of people are there...)...

After using them for a few weeks for professional mixing and mastering, i can assure that the Westone Mach 80 are as close to perfectly flat as I ever heard. I trust them blindly and everything I mix/master just sounds exactly how it should when confirming the result with my calibrated Neumann...

Also a lot of targets are based on flat measuring studio reference monitors in an anechoic chambers (that are sometimes, depending on the target, then put into an room) while music is made with studio reference monitors that are calibrated to be flat inside the room. In theory, most of these...

Like Studio Reference Monitor Speakers used for mixing and mastering. I wonder if that is an coincidence or intentional :P :D

With my Head-fi experience, i can say for sure. The more expensive it is, the better it sounds, unrelated to how it sounds

Because i am, not 100% confident in which Westone MACH Series sounds really closest to Studio Reference Monitors (and i absolutely hate to recommend things i am not 100% sure if they really deliver), i rented all of them for 2 days so i can compare them, in detail, in an controlled environment...