Search results

Yeah terrible indeed.

Can anyone provide the oratory csv for equalizer apo? Or tell me what BW can be translated in the txt given to EApo?

I just bought it out of curiosity, for 140euro Out of the box I can hear many of the strenghts relsted to planars. I don't think anything at this price point can be compared with normal drivers. I tried to ear a sweep Sine with my ears and I don't ear such a messy frequency response...

Are you upsampling externally?

I have had it for 1.5 years, and the only issue I'm facing is that sometimes I get R3 Error (or 5, don't remember), probably around 1 every 10 switch ons. It disapears as soon as I restart it, and I always switch it off from the back button when I finish using it. Using it pretty much every day

But what is feeding your dac? That's the key in using no filter, not what's after. You are filtering analog signal that's already been converted wrongly The use of analog filters may be used to.reach a more gentle approach compared to oversample or digital filters, but still I think the sabre...

This mean you are actually filtering the file before reaching the dac? This actually may be the same, but honestly I don't understand why doing so instead of using dac filters

Actually I'm no expert Anyway on do300 side you can't do much, but what exactly is the filtering at 20khz on the dcx?

You may have a look at this post

How are you reaching the correct filter off configuration? You should not have the +4db

I am currently selling this for 200euros in italy, and there's no much market...I should try internationally If the battery is still good (mine lasts 6hours after probably 7 years) I think is a decent price

So the default +2db is actually better and should be used? Thanks for the test!

Unfortunately no

I see, sorry mate cannot help you on this. I have been using usb3 ports for ages, no issues. The printer cables used for these dacs are Anyways 2.0, and usb3 ports must be compatible with 2.0. From my point of view, suggesting using 2.0 in 2024 is pretty ridiculous and unless they support...

Dacs do not need a usbc/3.x connection because the bandwidth of the 2.0 is enough. So it may be true that usbc is used for convenience only. But they should work fine also connected to usb3 ports

Sure, but I wanted to understand where smsl said such a thing, for which device. Because it seems something related to a pretty old one. Or a new one with old technology? I haven't been using 2.0 for ages, and all audio interfaces are connected through a printer usb cable (that's usb 2) to 3.1...

Where?? And why?? Anyway it's all BS. Usb 3 is totally fine, and you cannot find a true usb2 port on PC anymore and an adapter doesn't make it 2.0. And no you will not hear any difference if the usb port 3.0 and cable is well made

The use of filter off behavior is similar to NOS described here: https://samplerateconverter.com/educational/nos-dac it's mainly the advantage of not using filter that may introduce artifacts, but they may have other drawbacks. the issue here is that people does not know exactly how NOS works...

It's a pretty complex topic, and I don't remember all the details myself, but: - the volume level it's not causing the issue - digital filters are in this case needed to avoid imaging(not aliasing), and so the distortion caused by the intermodulation of these ultrasonic images. so, I don't...

It's the latest discussion and the answer is few replies back