Search results

Everybody has given me a ton to think about here and it will take me a long time to fully comprehend everything that has been said. Thanks for everyone who has participated in the convo so far. In the meantime I want to make some things clear because I might not have done the best job...

Exactly!

If estimated in-room response means the estimated frequency response that a microphone would pick up in a room, then no, that is not what I mean. I mean a curve that shows frequency response from the listening position but modified to include how the characteristics of the reflections would...

I feel like multiple people don't quite understand what I am proposing. We can't standardize frequency response. I know this. Sure a microphone measuring only frequency response does not match up with how our brain perceives frequency response, but if I may, as an amateur audio enthusiast...

True. Sorry if this was unclear, but what I meant was that even if the measurement looks the same across both systems, they won't necessarily sound to a human being like they have the same frequency response even when you're sitting right in the measurement position.

I want to reiterate that I understand that how a system sounds is more than just PFR, but I would think that standardizing one aspect of the sound is much better than standardizing zero aspects of the sound, and PFR would end up being a much more meaningful thing to standardize than regular old...

But our eyes all see differently and yet we've created a standard for video calibration. How is that different?

There are a ton of people on this forum smarter and more knowledgeable than me, so I'm hoping someone could explain why I'm wrong, why this is a useless idea, or on the flip side, inform me that this isn't a novel idea and that people are already working on this. I have recently learned that...