• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

ATC Loudspeakers 'Entry' Consumer Series

OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
It's a non issue for me the room has a vaulted ceiling and some stone walls; so is not a 'cuboid box'; so no isssues as far as I can tell.

I bought ATC's on the strength of their accuracy because I had become involved in a recording project with a Grammy winning producer/engineer in the USA (that's another story for another day). Anyway I'm highly impressed with them and would say the actives, when you take into account amplification cost (tri amps in each one), are a bit of a bargain.

I think the actives are a good buy in the UK. In the USA, they're definitely very high quality, there is a $6k gap between the passive and the active version. It's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, but $6k can buy very high quality amplification and still have money left over for an active external DSP crossover (Behringer, dbx, miniDSP, etc) that provides more options than what is built into the SCM40.

Regardless, though, I love the fact ATC, as far as I know, is the only speaker maker where you can get the exact same driver used in the pro monitors -- the SCM40 uses exactly the same midrange and woofer as the SCM25A and SCM45A, and the same midrange as the SCM50A on upwards.

That gets you much closer to hearing what the engineers heard in the studio (if they used ATC).
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Here would be an interesting experiment:

1. Get a Devialet Expert Pro 440, which is capable of dual stereo and has DSP configurable high/low pass filters for each amp (unforunately, it can't do both high and low pass, so a 3 way is out).

screen-capture.png
screen-capture-1.png
screen-capture-2.png


2. Get an ATC 2-way passive, like the SC19 v2 or, more cheaply, the pro SCM20 PSL. Disconnect the internal passive crossovers, drive with external active DSP crossover.

atc-scm20psl-mk2_3.jpg


3. Optionally, implement SAM (which only effects <150 Hz).

screen-capture-3.png


I guess you could also do it with a 3-way if you were willing to have a hybrid active/passive combo.

Hmmmm...

@Frank Dernie maybe you could try this with those old ProAcs in your study :)
 
Last edited:

Frank Dernie

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
6,452
Likes
15,798
Location
Oxfordshire
Here would be an interesting experiment:

1. Get a Devialet Expert Pro 440, which is capable of dual stereo and has DSP configurable high/low pass filters for each amp (unforunately, it can't do both high and low pass, so a 3 way is out).

View attachment 8808 View attachment 8809 View attachment 8811

2. Get an ATC 2-way passive, like the SC19 v2 or, more cheaply, the pro SCM20 PSL. Disconnect the internal passive crossovers, drive with external active DSP crossover.

atc-scm20psl-mk2_3.jpg


3. Optionally, implement SAM (which only effects <150 Hz).

View attachment 8812

I guess you could also do it with a 3-way if you were willing to have a hybrid active/passive combo.

Hmmmm...

@Frank Dernie maybe you could try this with those old ProAcs in your study :)
I have considered trying the SAM profile of the ATC SCM 50, and also the SAM profile for Yamaha NS1000 in my bedroom, but in the end I prefer listening to music than dicking around with kit, so I haven't yet sticking to Devialets into Epilogs. I have a friend with modified NS1000s who would like my comments on SAM on them so that is more likely first.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
So I was reading on WBF where AJ (is he still a member) was arguing that ATC's drivers are old school and we've moved on from the days of needing big motor drivers.

On the one hand, most ATC driver designs (except the tweeter) are decades old.

On the other hand, despite advances in material science and measuring, physics hasn't changed.

Thoughts?
 

Frank Dernie

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
6,452
Likes
15,798
Location
Oxfordshire
A friend of mine is a speaker design consultant in a well known partnership which designs speakers for several manufacturers (confidentially) both high end and mass market, and drive units for big car manufacturers too.
He tells me that producing a low distortion mid range unit is quite easy with modern materials and computer modelling to make it pistonic in the whole passband and have a very linear magnetic circuit, both of these are very rare according to him in most units, particularly the motor. IIRC he told me one of their car drivers costing well under €1 has 1kHz distortion under 0.1%
Pistonic tweeters otoh are very expensive to make and even the pistonic ones are naturally narrow in directivity, so there are still loads of different types out there trying to ameliorate these problems.
Bass units are exceptionally expensive because of size, material and particularly a long travel efficient linear motor is exceedingly expensive.
Traditional materials with damped diaphragms sound "familiar" and don't break up violently and are much cheaper. I am sure the ATC drive units are under continuous scrutiny at ATC. After all they ended up designing a new tweeter a while ago since they felt this had been a weakness.
It would not surprise me to learn that there are theoretically better drivers out there but much better? I doubt it, and their products are probably at the peak of the "old-fashioned" development curve.
Does a Kii use better drive units, or does it rely on other strengths for its aclaimed performance? What about reliability and longevity?
The ATC drivers in my ProAcs are over 30 years old and, if needed, ATC will still service them for a modest cost.
OTOH if the shipping and so forth to the USA are as punitive as in the other direction (US hifi is often 50%+ more expensive here than domestically) maybe a US made alternative would make more sense???
 
Last edited:

Purité Audio

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Barrowmaster
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
9,127
Likes
12,339
Location
London
I believe Kii and Dutch&Dutch use drivers suitable for the application, then correct any anomalies with DSP, motion feedback etc, the Kii's and D&Ds 8Cs sound clearer because of their cardioid response and ingenious design.
Keith
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
A friend of mine is a speaker design consultant in a well known partnership which designs speakers for several manufacturers (confidentially) both high end and mass market, and drive units for big car manufacturers too.
He tells me that producing a low distortion mid range unit is quite easy with modern materials and computer modelling to make it pistonic in the whole passband and have a very linear magnetic circuit, both of these are very rare according to him in most units, particularly the motor.

Here is a very thorough review and set of measurements of the ATC 3" midrange dome:

https://app.box.com/s/j1pwj8exbmioz350nu0n

And here is a paste of the distortion graph from the PDF:

screen-capture.png

The author says ( I have no idea if this is true):

"In the arena of distortion, this is where the driver really shines. Even though this is an older driver that has
been around for years, and there is nothing particularly advanced in its motor design, its distortion is
exceptionally low pretty much at state of the art levels in the midrange band
."
 

Frank Dernie

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
6,452
Likes
15,798
Location
Oxfordshire
Well the ATC mid dome has been considered SOTA here for decades, I like mine, but is a bit more than €1.
Nearer to £400 for the basic model and £550 for the higher efficiency model last time I looked
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Well the ATC mid dome has been considered SOTA here for decades, I like mine, but is a bit more than €1.
Nearer to £400 for the basic model and £550 for the higher efficiency model last time I looked

As far as I know, the cost is now 'infinity' as they no longer sell individual driver units at all.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
For those who are curious, I found a spec sheet for the ATC bass and mid-bass drivers (including the Super Linear SB75-150SL), as well as two sheets for the regular "super" versions of the tweeter (SH25-76 & SH-25-76S):
 

Attachments

  • ATC-Driver-Specs.pdf
    1.2 MB · Views: 1,041
  • SH25-76+Technical+Datasheet.pdf
    1.4 MB · Views: 930
  • SH25-76S+Technical+Datasheet.pdf
    1.4 MB · Views: 1,592
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
So my (previously owned, new to me) Devialet 400 is here, should be setting it up in the next week or two.

Still trying to decide between SCM19 v2 or the SCM20PSL Mk 2.

The pro speakers are $800 cheaper, come only in a black rectangular box, but have the S-version of the tweeter and a lower crossover point at 2.1khz.

Mid-bass drivers and extension the same between the two.

As far as I can tell, the S-tweeter is more sensitive, which is semi moot as the tweeter has to be padded down to the sensitivity of the mid/bass. But the higher sensitivity would allow for same output with less juice, leading to long term better resistance to over heating / power compression....do I care about that as a home user?

Inputs welcome.
 
D

Deleted member 65

Guest
So my (previously owned, new to me) Devialet 400 is here, should be setting it up in the next week or two.

Still trying to decide between SCM19 v2 or the SCM20PSL Mk 2.

The pro speakers are $800 cheaper, come only in a black rectangular box, but have the S-version of the tweeter and a lower crossover point at 2.1khz.

Mid-bass drivers and extension the same between the two.

As far as I can tell, the S-tweeter is more sensitive, which is semi moot as the tweeter has to be padded down to the sensitivity of the mid/bass. But the higher sensitivity would allow for same output with less juice, leading to long term better resistance to over heating / power compression....do I care about that as a home user?

Inputs welcome.

If you're into DIY I'd build these instead http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/AT-SW.htm, cabinet from Dayton. Not too much work I think.

Think you'll be happy with the amp. My younger brother had one driving bigger MBL's and was very happy with sq.
 

Soniclife

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,508
Likes
5,436
Location
UK
So my (previously owned, new to me) Devialet 400 is here, should be setting it up in the next week or two.

Congrats, interested in what you think subjectively when you get it going. Also interested in the possibility of Amir measuring it, if possible.

No idea about the speaker choice, other than to try and be honest with yourself about the aesthetic part, especially if you think you will own them long term.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
Congrats, interested in what you think subjectively when you get it going. Also interested in the possibility of Amir measuring it, if possible.

I've already used the Dev with two sets of speakers (Martin Logan, Dynaudio). To me it doesn't really sound like anything.
 

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,247
Likes
17,162
Location
Riverview FL
Here would be an interesting experiment:

1. Get a Devialet Expert Pro 440 ...


Waaaaaaaa!!!


(that's Japanese for whatever you want it to mean at the time)

upload_2017-10-5_9-53-3.png
 
Top Bottom