• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Denafrips ARES II USB R2R DAC Review

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,292
Likes
3,880
I really want to see their power amplifier tested.
 

essence

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
37
Likes
33
Nice. The Holo Audio May already proved that R2R DACs can measure quite well too. It is the current benchmark of R2Rs.

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...may-probably-the-best-discrete-r2r-dac.10161/

Too bad its a prototype. This matches Holo Audio's current offerings with slightly better DR. And seeing the May's current pricing with the various addons is stretching very close to Mola Mola territory.

I really want to see their power amplifier tested.

Me too. The preamp as well. I have the Hyperion and the only thing I can tell you its really quiet, can have my ears next to tweeter at full volume and zero hiss. Oh and it comes with a remote thats a glorified on/off switch which I am finding extremely useful.

Their self-posted APx measurement showed it matched the stated spec of SINAD of 100db~ and much more than the advertised power.
 

Francis Vaughan

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
933
Likes
4,697
Location
Adelaide Australia
Measuring the NOS mode would be really interesting. There is so much wrong with the rationale behind NOS, and yet so much BS talked about it, that some proper numbers would be quite helpful. Especially from a DAC that otherwise seems to be well designed.
 

digicidal

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
1,981
Likes
4,838
Location
Sin City, NV
This isn't a mechanical watch. It's still just circuits. A mechanical DAC would be something.
I believe the analogy was more about the amount of time and effort required to design and produce the device in question - not so much the actual type of engineering required.

I actually like this analogy because in many ways a DAC is almost exactly like a watch... while their prices range from a few dollars to tens of thousands in their market... the performance differences (excluding those which arguably fail completely) can be measured in hundredths of a percentage point. :D Also the perceived value is subjective and almost entirely exclusive of how it performs it's task... with the most expensive and desirable models often failing miserably, while the inexpensive models are derided mostly for aesthetic reasons alone (or perceived lack of cache).

EDIT - To be fair however... that Apple dongle or Casio digital isn't ever going to be worth what you spent on it... even if it still works 50 years later... while a Rolex, etc. (and possibly a few esoteric DACs - though less likely) could even eventually be traded for a nice car or condo. ;)
 
Last edited:

tifune

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
1,085
Likes
767
Can't the same thing be said about most of the DACs that test decently on here?



Don't plenty of people buy DACs this price or higher that have 'high performance' that isn't really audible? Is it that different to buy a DAC with a lack of distortion that isn't audible or buy a DAC with some other 'feature' to the performance that isn't audible?

I don't see anything wrong with buying a DAC based on performance numbers just for performance numbers sake and I also don't see anything wrong with buying a DAC based on liking something about the implementation. In both cases the owners probably enjoy their DAC more because of those things.

I don't dispute any of your points, I'm just trying to understand the appeal of R2R specifically.
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,891
Likes
35,912
Location
The Neitherlands
People are lead to or believe that somehow sample values are more accurate when using ladder type converters and are lead to believe that DS is merely a cheap way of converting and sounds poorer.

Religion mostly fed by conversations between proponents and disgust for people claiming otherwise.

It is clear that performance is dependent on the implementation. It is also clear that there are poor ladder based and poor DS based (or other) conversion types. Likewise it is clear that both methods can produce top notch performance.

The problem lies in the subjective evaluations and the fact that everyone has an opinion, experience and 'religion' (or should I say preference for a certain line of thinking). That and a free choice of thinking accounts for the 'perceived differences and preferences' not so much the actual performance.
 

firedog

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2016
Messages
378
Likes
642
This is absolute hogwash. There are practical reasons to have a preamp between the dac and the an easy way to control volume for one. But adding one isn’t going to make it more “musical” that is once again psychoacoustics at work. You are imagining that your music sounds better.

Or it adds colortion-distortion that he finds pleasant and musical when it is part of the background sound mixed in with the music.
 

Tks

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Messages
3,221
Likes
5,494
People are lead to or believe that somehow sample values are more accurate when using ladder type converters and are lead to believe that DS is merely a cheap way of converting and sounds poorer.

Religion mostly fed by conversations between proponents and disgust for people claiming otherwise.

It is clear that performance is dependent on the implementation. It is also clear that there are poor ladder based and poor DS based (or other) conversion types. Likewise it is clear that both methods can produce top notch performance.

The problem lies in the subjective evaluations and the fact that everyone has an opinion, experience and 'religion' (or should I say preference for a certain line of thinking). That and a free choice of thinking accounts for the 'perceived differences and preferences' not so much the actual performance.

Uh oh ;)
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
20,745
Likes
20,757
Location
Canada
Or it adds colortion-distortion that he finds pleasant and musical when it is part of the background sound mixed in with the music.
Maybe. I for one used the headphone output of a Sony CD player for months until I bought a Krell pre-amp and I noticed no difference between the two other than the Krell was a louder system.
 

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
3,194
Likes
2,570

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,029
Likes
10,796
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Hello @amirm,

Thank you for your efforts to review the DENAFRIPS ARES II.

Best,
Alvin @ Vinshine Audio
Any chance of sending the Terminator? I am waiting a long time for this dac to be measured here. :)
 

Frank Dernie

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
6,445
Likes
15,780
Location
Oxfordshire
Imagining or not, if it sounds sublime then that is what matters....aahhh, ignorance is bliss :p
Quite so. If you are convinced it sounds better and are enjoying it it doesn't much matter whether you are imagining the difference or not.
Obviously the componentry in the analogue output stage don't matter a fig if the output from the device is unaffected, but knowing some reassuringly fashionable circuitry is there will definitely help the imagination.
 
Top Bottom