• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Neumann KH420 Review (Studio Monitor)

Rate this speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 3 0.6%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 29 5.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 490 93.5%

  • Total voters
    524

DJBonoBobo

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
1,377
Likes
2,877
Location
any germ
What is the cabinet materiel?

1651607475620.png


BTW, the whole front of the KH310 is made of polyurethane, too.
 

dfuller

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
3,390
Likes
5,221
MDF works very well, it's cheap, and easily workable. Downside is it's not particularly strong.

Aluminum works well too, but it's more expensive and harder to work (really you have to cast it, and creating reusable casting molds costs a freakin' ton of money).

Plastic I can't see much upside to other than ease of casting complex shapes (like waveguides).
 

Pearljam5000

Master Contributor
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
5,211
Likes
5,443
I don't know
MDF reminds me of Ikea more than anything else
On the other hand even Focal Utopia is made out of MDF and they cost more than my house
 

dfuller

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
3,390
Likes
5,221
I don't know
MDF reminds me of Ikea more than anything else
On the other hand even Focal Utopia is made out of MDF and they cost more than my house
MDF is a really good speaker cabinet material. It's cheap, it's heavy and nonresonant, and it's easy to machine.
 

Sancus

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,926
Likes
7,636
Location
Canada
I suspect cost is a substantial reason that Neumann didn't make full aluminum cabinets for the KH 310 and KH 420, unlike the KH120. The big molds are very expensive and maybe they don't sell enough volume to justify it. Genelec's prices of comparable models are somewhat higher and I also would expect that Genelec sells significantly more speakers in general. The number of models in their lineup wouldn't be feasible if they weren't doing a good amount of volume.
 

respice finem

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
1,867
Likes
3,777
Those monitors are tools, not toys, so the manufacturers just take what works. Even the damage pictures show it does - by absorbing energy.
 

Somafunk

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
1,403
Likes
3,300
Location
Scotland
In my opinion the main reason Genelec use a cast aluminium construction for the cabinet is due to the rounded construction to ameliorate edge diffraction which would be impossible to construct in mdf, it could be made in carbon fibre and the sound tailored by use of various densities/epoxies used, you could have a choice of surface finishes and lay up design which would be pretty cool.

Neumann designs are basic box construction so no need nor advantage to aluminium construction.
 

temps

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Messages
199
Likes
347
Hi

That there is a Genelec bent in ASR constituency is clear and understandable: The company churns out on a regular basis great products with forward thinking engineering and performance. It needs to be clear to all that Neuman has never taken a back seat to Genelec. as a matter of facts, they are their most serious competition. This KH420 is the superior speaker, in most areas. That such is achieved without DSP is not a minus but a plus in my book. That it was achieved many years ago, let you know how good these people at Klein and Hummel have been and for a long while, perhaps before Genelec.

People should not think that High , actual, performance in a room is automatic because of the intrinsic qualities of the speaker. We need to be reminded of this regularly: The Kii3, The D&D 8c, etc.., however amenable they may be to domestic environments do not automatically perform superlatively when placed in a domestic or studio environment, for that matter. In the case of the Kii3, I don't know what DRC or EQ is provided , in the case of the 8c, one needs to master, yes, master REW to extract the best from it... Genelec does provide the GLM tool for its DSP speakers such as the 8361.. Neuman does provide the MA-1, but it requires that the speakers be DSP-equipped or if not, then that at least, the subwoofer must be DSP.. which tends to force you into an all Neumann solution .. then again GLM is an all Genelec solution too... GLM doesn't control non-Genelec subwoofers .. you could cobbler a GLM with another DSP/EQ but ... it becomes a Rube Goldberg situation with GLM for the Genelec and whatever DSP/EQ you use for the subwoofers and integration, will be difficult, definitely not ideal...
Soooooo.. here we are, likely the best speaker reviewed by @Amir thus far.

Peace
It's worth noting that you can go with a Dirac based system and free yourself from "locking in" to a manufacturer's ecosystem. In almost all cases, the cost of multichannel Dirac will be offset buying a consumer sub instead of a professional one. It does seem a bit silly to not use a monitors' built in DSP but when you only have to spend ~$150-200 extra on your room correction, to save $1,000+ on your subwoofer.... not a bad idea, especially since Dirac brought back the systemwide application which is (imo) excellent and thrifty when it comes to CPU cycles.

It doesn't appear that Neumann MA-1 supports the 420 at all? It says it supports monitors the 750 DSP supports, and the 420 is not listed there.
AFAIR the KH 120 is also aluminium.
it is indeed ... while the KH 80 is composite polycarbonate. It'll be interesting to see if KH 120 is still aluminum, and what the KH 150 is made of.
1651615926360.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GDK

Kervel

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
May 20, 2019
Messages
120
Likes
144
Below, an 8 times cheaper but class leading in low distortion small monitor - the Genelec 8030C.
There is not much difference in distortion between these three loudspeakers at 86 dB .

You can't compare relative distortion when the 8030C rolls off much earlier. Yes it has low distortion at 40hz, but very low output as well. That's why Amir also reports distortion in db together with output level.
 

dfuller

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
3,390
Likes
5,221
Are these 'Noymun' KH420 speaker cabinets structurally braced internally?
I would be more surprised if they weren't, to be honest - they're big boxes. I didn't see any in the KH310 but that's also a much more compact box. CORRECTION: KH310s do have a brace internally running top to bottom.
 

Vintage57

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
412
Likes
596
Location
Ontario, Canada

Pearljam5000

Master Contributor
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
5,211
Likes
5,443
So Basically KH420 should be much cheaper than 8361:
*Aluminum vs cheaper MDF
*Older model/ design / drivers vs newly designed drivers / cabinet
* No room correction
*Coaxial vs "traditional"
 

Vintage57

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
412
Likes
596
Location
Ontario, Canada
It does not apply to the reason for me asking that question... I think swan dives and speakers don't get along... even structurally speaking!
Agreed
 

dfuller

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
3,390
Likes
5,221
So Basically KH420 should be much cheaper than 8361:
*Aluminum vs cheaper MDF
*Older model/ design / drivers vs newly designed drivers / cabinet
* No room correction
*Coaxial vs "traditional"
I mean... no?
They're bigger. Shipping costs more because of that. They weigh about the same amount.
Those drivers ain't cheap. They're low volume custom designs, with the woofer being (IIRC) made in France (and we all know how much French labor costs). That drives the cost up.
Coaxial doesn't suddenly make a driver better, and dome midranges as a general rule are pretty expensive to do well.
 

Sancus

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,926
Likes
7,636
Location
Canada
So Basically KH420 should be much cheaper than 8361:
KH420 ARE cheaper at least in the US(~$5200 vs $6000). The biggest cost in any complex product is labour. It is possible that, after the (large) capital cost of the molds, it's actually cheaper for Genelec to mass produce their cabinets with casting. Especially since they're made in Finland where the workers are paid relatively well.

Either way, though, the price of high end products like these are more about what the market is willing to pay relative to alternatives. The KH 420 is competitive with the 8361A. If Neumann CAN make them cheaper, then that's extra margin for them. Though I suspect they're not really that much cheaper to make. I wouldn't be too surprised if the analog crossover and EQ system is actually more expensive than a DSP version would be.
 
Last edited:

pierre

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
963
Likes
3,052
Location
Switzerland
Bringing it back on topic to the Neumann, why hasn't the auto EQ addressed the bass dip? I'm assuming the post-EQ preference score takes a hit because of it..
View attachment 204179
AutoEQ could flatten it but below 100 hz (or more) you will need to correct in room in any case.

For this speaker, anechoic EQ is not useful.
 
Top Bottom