I have LP's going back to the late 50's, and while I agree with the points made here, I do find a LOT of digital re-masters of older material that are sometimes vastly better than the LP's. (Admittedly, this is partly because LP re-pressings of non-classical material were often abysmal. Still, a careful digital re-master of preserved original master tapes can be eye-openingly good on occasion.) This is mostly (though not entirely) for still-popular artists. At the other extreme, I have many LP's (and CD's for that matter) that aren't even available in streaming services. Levimax is right that the only way to capture the full range of older music is to have TT's as well as streaming or CD.I think it depends on what type of music you listen to and from what era. While people will argue about whether or not DAC's and Amp's have reached "transparency" I don't think anyone will argue that any "source" is even close to transparent. I listen to my TT a lot but not for any recent releases (recent being the last 20 years or so) that were recorded digitally.... while the mastering on some of these recent releases "may" be better on vinyl the digital-vinyl-analog conversion process is expensive and can only degrade the sound. Having said that I do collect "original non-remastered CD's" of digitally recorded music to avoid the "loudness wars" issues of most re-masters.
For older music however (Mid-1980's or older and especially Mid-1950's through the 1970s ) I will seek out the original vinyl pressings. For most of the music from this era the "best source" is going to be the original vinyl pressings. Master tapes very often were mishandled, lost or stolen and they degrade over time. By the time this older music was transferred to digital in the 1980's the combination of worn out tapes, less than careful transfers, and early digital technology made many of these recordings noticeably inferior to the original vinyl. Unfortunately technology can not "fix" worn out tapes so the vinyl remains the "best sources" for decades of recorded music. I do a lot of ABX between original pressings and modern digital and vinyl reissues and in most (not all of course) cases the original vinyl sounds better... sometimes a lot better. In addition I like to go to used record stores and go "treasure hunting" both for artists I know and ones that are new to me.
If you are at all interested in pre-1980's music I would highly recommend you get a TT and check it out for your self. I think you will be pleasantly surprised what the "state of the art" was for recordings made in the 60's and 70's ... much different than the versions you will hear over the steaming services.
In the end, I have sold my turntable, but sometimes wish I still had it for the hundreds of LP's I haven't been able to bring myself to sell.
Looking big picture: I find the streaming catalog amazing, a fantastic case of technology making that which was once expensive (buying hundreds of LP's and CD's for thousands of dollars) much cheaper ($7.99/mo. for >75 million cuts of lossless music on Amazon Music HD). An economist would call this a "hedonic" masterpiece of technology, meaning not only lower costs but additional quality, utility or pleasure, perhaps better than the improving cost/performance ratio of the PC since 1980. Not only that: the entry-level cost of a truly audiophile system is now down to a few hundred dollars (SOTA dac/amp plus good headphones or IEM's). Of course you can also go to a costly opposite extreme -- including turntables -- that has never been more extreme ... but ASR members can mostly use common sense and objective reviews in making such upgrades.
So I gave up access to some out print albums by selling my turntable, but have gained the entire world of recorded music for a relative pittance via streaming. Turntables don't have enough appeal for me in the end. Bring on the 74,990,000 recordings I haven't heard yet.
Last edited: