Real driving involves accidentally doing money shifts:Real driving involves shifting one's own gears. Period.
Real driving involves accidentally doing money shifts:Real driving involves shifting one's own gears. Period.
I would, too - - but I enjoy shiftin' gears.
There are precious few that are only available with a manual transmission.
I never tire of driving it, even in heavy traffic. It's like therapy.
View attachment 190030
Ouch, that video hurts just to watch. Soon after my daughter learned to drive, we took a road trip from WA to So Cal. She did some of the driving to gain more experience. Slow in fast out cornering, downshifting for acceleration, passing safely, stuff like that. At one point we were stuck behind a motor home going 55 in a 65 zone on 2 land road. I told her to downshift from 6th to 3rd to pass, and MAKE SURE it's 3rd gear not 1st gear; push it straight forward from neutral, do not push it left. She asked what would happen if she accidentally hit 1st gear. I told here that's called the "money shift" because it destroys the transmission, engine, or both. That got her attention.Real driving involves accidentally doing money shifts ...
ICEs are indeed bad, but that doesn't mean EVs are better. When you drive an EV, you may not be polluting, but the carbon costs have already been built in to the car and carry on further with the batteries.As do I, but there's no way around the harms of ICE.
That would be time to move or shift jobs. I'm willing to do a 30 minute commute, but only because much of it is on a twisty canyon road.I used to think that until having to deal with two hour stop-and-go-traffic commutes.
By having adjustable spider weights the clutch engagement point could be varied. That would change the gear ratio dependent on RPM and where the driver selected the ratio and weights to be. Like a sport mode and a cruise mode.Manual driver here, but contrary to popular opinion I actually like the idea of CVTs. The only problem is their implementation.
What you actuall need is manual CVT. Not the fake shifting BS, but a big sliding lever like the throttle on a boat or plane to let you change the gear ratio as you see fit.
I don't know about that. My 1999 Acura Integra GS-R has been stolen twice. Finally sold it this year after thieves tried to push start it, with another vehicle, down the parking lot ramp. Great little car. Really fun to drive. Called it my go-cart.Manual Gearbox AKA 21st century anti-theft device....
This has been addressed several times and yes overall EVs are better. Yes including what is built into the car and batteries.ICEs are indeed bad, but that doesn't mean EVs are better. When you drive an EV, you may not be polluting, but the carbon costs have already been built in to the car and carry on further with the batteries.
Wow - Porches driven on a race track had better throttle response than a Subaru.The idea of CVT is better than the implementation I've driven. The Subaru I drove with a CVT had the worst throttle response I've ever experienced. Worse than slush box automatics from the 70s and 80s. Stomp the gas pedal and while the engine revved up quickly enough, I could count slowly to 3 or 4 (literally!) before the tranny fully engaged and started moving the car.
I drove some new Porsches around the local race track last year and their throttle response and automatic shifting was much better. They were fast nice handling cars. But while they were fun to drive, I knew that if I bought one for myself I'd get the stick shift because I prefer the engagement & experience, even if they might be a tenth or two slower around the track.
I wasn't comparing the Subaru to the Porsches. I was comparing it to other automatics I've driven dating back to 1970s. It had the worst (slowest) response of any car I have ever driven. I mentioned the Porsches only to indicate that all automatics aren't bad; some get it right and don't have that problem.Wow - Porches driven on a race track had better throttle response than a Subaru.
Just being a smart ass. I agree that the Subaru's have a slow throttle response.I wasn't comparing the Subaru to the Porsches. I was comparing it to other automatics I've driven dating back to 1970s. It had the worst (slowest) response of any car I have ever driven. I mentioned the Porsches only to indicate that all automatics aren't bad; some get it right and don't have that problem.
Response isn't the same as power or acceleration. An underpowered economy car can be responsive, even if it's not fast.
Didn’t have much of a choice, sadly. Company moved my lab from a 40 minute train ride to a two hours in hell drive. Moving was financially out of the question.That would be time to move or shift jobs. I'm willing to do a 30 minute commute, but only because much of it is on a twisty canyon road.