Reviews
Review Index
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Donations
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
terryforsythe's latest activity
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
Read the last paper I cited. It discloses doing exactly what you say cannot be done.
Sunday at 7:50 AM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
To summarize, the discussion between antcollinet and myself began with the following post by me: That understanding was reached by...
Sunday at 6:36 AM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
I overlooked responding to this last comment. Your interpretation is inconsistent with the evidence. See section 4.1 of "Designing and...
Sunday at 5:23 AM
terryforsythe
reacted to
tmtomh's post
in the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
with
Like
.
Thanks for your reply. My understanding of the eye roll is to communicate skepticism, not thinking. But now that you've clarified what...
Sunday at 4:08 AM
terryforsythe
reacted to
sunjam's post
in the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
with
Like
.
I read this as below (with my own understanding of dithering): "That dithering can only be applied at the time of quantisation - IE...
Sunday at 4:00 AM
terryforsythe
reacted to
sunjam's post
in the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
with
Like
.
The eye roll because I am thinking (sorry if you have a different interpretation of if). By the way, what do you think of the meaning of...
Sunday at 3:49 AM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
He did, but I believe the confusion was based on the portion I quoted. Specifically, I interpreted the statement "That dithering can...
Sunday at 3:42 AM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
Please provide your interpretation of the references or, better yet, a scientific paper that supports antcollinet's contention "That...
Saturday at 10:31 PM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
I believe that is an incorrect assumption. If you have a reference that supports that contention, I'll look at it. But, I found...
Saturday at 7:55 PM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
Dithering is used to address that. (Dither is an intentionally applied from of noise used to randomize quantization error.)
Saturday at 7:36 PM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
Your understanding of the references is different than mine. Again, see p. 2 of...
Saturday at 7:32 PM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
Also, see p. 2 of https://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/tutorials/mt-017.pdf, which states: OVESAMPLING INTERPOLATING DACS...
Saturday at 6:55 PM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
Please point to which reference, and the passage of the reference, to which you are referring.
Saturday at 6:48 PM
terryforsythe
replied to the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
.
I do too, so long as it is kept civil and respectful.
Saturday at 6:38 PM
terryforsythe
reacted to
sunjam's post
in the thread
Upsampling 16/44.1 collection a good idea?
with
Like
.
It is good someone is learning like I do with this thread. I love the beauty of on-line discussion. :cool:
Saturday at 6:36 PM
Members
Top
Bottom