Recent content by teched58

In fairness to Audiokarma, they're not used to hosting threads that grow to 10 pages long over the course of several days. Must've been all hands on deck over there.

Audiokarma appears to have deleted their entire thread, "Youtube Reviewer Threatened With Legal Action Over Speaker Review." It was at 12 pages yesterday. This morning it's gone. I guess they really have a bug up their digital butt over there about the high quality, quantitative work ASR is...

I've obtained this exclusive picture of Eric Alexander in the TekTon Design Control Room, as he struggles to keep up with the flood of social media posts condemning his online behavior, while he simultaneously conference calls with his sock puppets to direct their responses. If you stand in the...

Washington State residents can obtain an Antiharassment Protection Order (AHPO) as follows: "To protect against unwanted contact or behavior that causes substantial emotional distress and serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The contact could be a pattern of behavior that occurs over time...

A) You selectively enforce this B) Eric's behavior is at the core of this thread. How can we discuss his behavior without discussing his behavior?

I see another patent in Eric's future: "Building and Securing Loudspeaker Crossovers Using Common Materials Lying Around In Your Basement."

One potential pitfall is that engineering types may be willing to preemptively give up/negotiate away rights that journalists already have, which the engineers are unaware of. Engineers have an instinct for conciliation. Journalists have an instinct for combat. P.S. My final observation is...

Permission from the manufacturer to do a review is NEVER necessary. It sets a bad precedent. Procedurally, it could shut down any site that engages in it, because sites want to publish fast. Manufacturers want to review stuff written about them slooowly. Mainstream review sites like Consumer...

You are about to learn the meaning of the phrase "No good deed goes unpunished."

There is likely a very good reason Eric Alexander hasn't responded or said anything specific about the measurements: It's probably because, other than simple frequency response plots, ERIC ALEXANDER IS NOT CONVERSANT WITH AND CAN NEITHER READ NOR UNDERSTAND SPEAKER MEASUREMENTS. It someone...

Who gives a shiit what Eric wants? After they way he threatened Erin and Amir, after his bullying, babyish, batspit crazy behavior, HE DOESN'T GET TO DICTATE TERMS TO ANYONE. Getting on a Zoom "to work things" out with Eric is a prescription for having things get worse. Also, re his...

> JA1 wrote: Regardless of how the manufacturer reacts to seeing the print, the text of the review is not changed. If this is true, and I have no reason to doubt it, SP is on ethical solid ground and I withdraw any suggestion that it is not.

Eric is used to receiving a gentle massages from the reviewer -- in this case, Stereophile -- before a review of his speaker is published. (Above is a comment on the Youthman video on YT.)

Eric Alexander states that Stereophile shows their reviews to the company being reviewed IN ADVANCE OF PUBLICATION!! Wrecking ball Eric has let something out of the bag that I'm sure Jim Austin would rather have kept private. (Eric is so off the beam that he's now hurting his SUPPORTERS!) (On...

Did anyone read Atkinson's somewhat passive-aggressive comment, which is in the discussion beneath the SP Moab review? He writes: "... a 1990s Supreme Court opinion held that an opinion expressed by a recognized authority on a subject might not necessarily have First Amendment protection, the...