huw

I'm glad you're not my boss: "It's only just over half as much work again, what're you complaining about?!" :)

Concerning another topic: I have matched the two files ('dactest_comp.flac' & 'dactest_ref.flac' from D10s vs. DacMagic+) in DeltaWave...

That is very interesting! It wouldn't have surprised me if a trained listener with experience of using DeltaWave might have run exactly...

Weren't these 2 x 8 trial tests? I have to admit to being slightly confused by some of the discussion here. It seems obvious to me that...

No. I tried random guesses a few more times and got different scores as would be expected. The only bug is the incorrect date in the report.

It did :p Point noted indeed. We’ve been asking for the more standard 16 trials for quite some pages, which is one of the reasons why.

Much easier than that. You just need to monitor the output of Foobar with some measurement software (REW, Multitone, etc.) Even a small...

Example better than hundreds of explanations: Almost perfect result, hoorah, or rather not? :)The answer is no. foo_abx 2.1 report...

I'd never tried the foo_abx plugin before. One thing that surprised me is that the report does not indicate how much time was spent...

Yes I hoped the timing made it obvious that was just random clicking to generate the report. My point was that report also said "0126"...

I was interested in that and also the incorrect date - 0126. I tried the same version of foobar2000 and foo_abx and see the same thing...