• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Review and Measurements of Schiit Yggdrasil V2 DAC

SIY

Grand Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
10,479
Likes
25,223
Location
Alfred, NY
That's a good point. Alas, the selectively becomes poor with flat top and lobing gets excessive, making the graph look well, offensive if you get my drift :)

Yes, the tradeoff is peak amplitude accuracy versus cosmetics. It's a lousy window for resolving sidebands, but right tool for the right job and all that. :cool:

If you'll forgive me for pimping one of my articles, here's a review of common window types and their tradeoffs.
 

Thomas savage

Grand Contributor
The Watchman
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
10,260
Likes
16,304
Location
uk, taunton
That's a good point. Alas, the selectively becomes poor with flat top and lobing gets excessive, making the graph look well, offensive if you get my drift :)

View attachment 13543
I wonder if the lack of symmetry of the ‘balls’ is audible ... , maybe I will start a new thread on this.
 

gvl

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
3,461
Likes
4,050
Location
SoCal
So why did Schiit pick a 20 bit DAC for their flagship?

I suspect that for whatever subjective, business or nostalgic reason they wanted to have a multibit DAC in their portfolio, I haven't checked, but are 20+ bit multibit DAC chips still in production today?
 

gvl

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
3,461
Likes
4,050
Location
SoCal
No, not for audio.

Technically their AD chip isn't for audio either. Looking at other current multibit offerings you have to design your own ladder if you want to go lower than 20 bits.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,690
Likes
37,416
I suspect that for whatever subjective, business or nostalgic reason they wanted to have a multibit DAC in their portfolio, I haven't checked, but are 20+ bit multibit DAC chips still in production today?
Okay fine for some reason, other than performance, they picked a non-audio 20 bit DAC. That makes your complaint about Amir comparing his 23 or 24 bit DAC to a 20 bit DAC moot. Their DAC choice has put limitations on their performance. That is part of design. Don't make design choices that result in sub-par performance. Especially if that design is intended as your top of the line, flagship product.
 
Last edited:

Ron Texas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
6,189
Likes
9,276
Okay fine for some reason, other than performance, they picked a non-audio 20 bit DAC. That makes your complaint about Amir comparing his 23 or 24 bit DAC to a 20 bit DAC moot. Their DAC choices has put limitations on their performance. That is part of design. Don't make design choices that result in sub-par performance. Especially if that design is intended as your top of the line, flagship product.
Could the reason be marketing? By using a non audio DAC they try to position against other manufacturers using proprietary designs.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,690
Likes
37,416
Could the reason be marketing? By using a non audio DAC they try to position against other manufacturers using proprietary designs.

If you ask me the marketing is all that company has going for it. The idea they are doing different stuff than others.
 

derp1n

Senior Member
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
479
Likes
629
If you ask me the marketing is all that company has going for it. The idea they are doing different stuff than others.
Same with the "closed-form" supermegacombullschiit filter stuff. It doesn't even have as many filter taps as a baby Chord!

On the other hand, a 20 bit DAC makes sense if you believe "high res" is rubbish and meeting Red Book standards is sufficient. And Yggdrasil is linear to 16 bits even by Amir's strict criteria. SINAD, on the other hand, whoops.
 

gvl

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
3,461
Likes
4,050
Location
SoCal
With the filter interpolating to 20, or is it 24? 16 bits is not enough.

As for other comments, design decisions aside, I just wanted to know how it stacks up against other DACs based on 20 bit multibit chips, so saying its worse than a 24 bit DAC is really no surprise.
 

Alcophone

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2018
Messages
88
Likes
60
Location
San Francisco
Okay fine for some reason, other than performance, they picked a non-audio 20 bit DAC. That makes your complaint about Amir comparing his 23 or 24 bit DAC to a 20 bit DAC moot. Their DAC choice has put limitations on their performance. That is part of design. Don't make design choices that result in sub-par performance. Especially if that design is intended as your top of the line, flagship product.
April 21, 2015, Valencia, CA. The new Yggdrasil DAC from Schiit Audio is an entirely different take on "end-game" DAC design, eschewing the now-standard delta-sigma and DSD-optimized architectures to deliver optimal performance for the 99.99% of recorded music out there—music in PCM format.

"Yggdrasil was designed with a single goal in mind: to give you the most from the music you already have," said Mike Moffat, Co-Founder of Schiit Audio.
(Source)

While I now have quite a few albums with 24 bits, and more than 44.1 kHz, if I take into account my CDs from earlier days, and Spotify, the majority of the music I listen to is indeed 16 bit / 44.1 kHz. That's what the Yggdrasil is primarily designed for, rather than DSD, MQA or what have you.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,590
Likes
239,495
Location
Seattle Area
(Source)

While I now have quite a few albums with 24 bits, and more than 44.1 kHz, if I take into account my CDs from earlier days, and Spotify, the majority of the music I listen to is indeed 16 bit / 44.1 kHz. That's what the Yggdrasil is primarily designed for, rather than DSD, MQA or what have you.
That is not what their website says:

1530492202329.png


Did they ever verify the DAC produces 21 bits?

Their latest advertising now claims they even do better than 24 bits (140 dBFS): https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...-yggdrasil-ads-on-stereophile-may-issue.2633/

1530492357323.png


Their own ad says that is wrong given the strong power supply spikes that rise above the main tone let alone the rest of the noise/distortion:

index.php


The company claims here are quite obvious and unfortunately quite misleading at best, and false at worst.
 
Last edited:

rebbiputzmaker

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
1,099
Likes
463
That is not what their website says:

View attachment 13565

Did they ever verify the DAC produces 21 bits?

Their latest advertising now claims they even do better than 24 bits (140 dBFS): https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...-yggdrasil-ads-on-stereophile-may-issue.2633/

View attachment 13566

The own ad says that is wrong given the strong power supply spikes that rise above the main tone let alone the rest of the noise/distortion:

index.php


The company claims here are quite obvious and unfortunately quite misleading at best, and false at worst.
Are internal components/design causing the power supply noise you are measuring?
 
Top Bottom