I wonder if some of our new visitors have been watching this:
Amazingly, in twelve minutes, he makes no substantive points, but lobs a bucketful of red herrings, such as discussing medical experiments, confusing the use of controls with double blind protocol, mixing up relative preference and simply audible differences. Lots of describing irrelevant stuff to pad it and make it look like he's actually addressing the subject. A steak analogy that's a nothngburger, and, naturally, the 'golden ears' fallacy gets a long and self-centered airing. Just terrible.
Amazingly, in twelve minutes, he makes no substantive points, but lobs a bucketful of red herrings, such as discussing medical experiments, confusing the use of controls with double blind protocol, mixing up relative preference and simply audible differences. Lots of describing irrelevant stuff to pad it and make it look like he's actually addressing the subject. A steak analogy that's a nothngburger, and, naturally, the 'golden ears' fallacy gets a long and self-centered airing. Just terrible.