- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
- Messages
- 4,800
- Likes
- 3,744
If anything, it's making the treble louder.Doesn't that sound "lifeless" with that correction?
If anything, it's making the treble louder.Doesn't that sound "lifeless" with that correction?
Received the JBL 305PMkII, disconnected the Elac and running the JBL since this afternoon. I plan an analytic listening session after a break-in, around 2000 hours, with a special CD, as described in the website sund guru.
A bit OT but seeing those were actives reminded me that if the ELACs didn't work out for me I was considering trying Focal Shapes (such as the 65 or Twins) after this at some point as I've heard them being described as sounding like active Arias. Probably more convenient too for me since I use em nearfield. Any experience with them, being based close to Focal?
I've earned the Focal Alpha 65 and now a pair of Alpha 50. I prefer the 50 (I am not a great bass lover), use it in nearfield, and I am very very happy with them. It's 100% in my taste.
The JBL are "special" in the first hours of listening. I am just waiting for the help from @daftcombo on Saturday, we will EQ these little things.
My wife told me the JBL looks aggressive. I answered it is perfectly normal, this is the Dark Vador's bride.
"Special" can have positive or negative contexts in English
It's different, really different than the Elac. I need few days to understand the difference. For the price, of course, it's a bargain, big sound, bass level, details etc... But for the moment it's "take that in your face" and to much highs for my taste.
I've earned the Focal Alpha 65 and now a pair of Alpha 50. I prefer the 50 (I am not a great bass lover), use it in nearfield, and I am very very happy with them. It's 100% in my taste.
The JBL are "special" in the first hours of listening. I am just waiting for the help from @daftcombo on Saturday, we will EQ these little things.
My wife told me the JBL looks aggressive. I answered it is perfectly normal, this is the Dark Vador's bride.
Did you toe them in or let them fire straight?It's different, really different than the Elac. I need few days to understand the difference. For the price, of course, it's a bargain, big sound, bass level, details etc... But for the moment it's "take that in your face" and to much highs for my taste.
Toe, few degrees, 5° I would say. Ok, I will go to no toe at all today.Did you toe them in or let them fire straight?
Will certainly do.Will look forward to this. Make sure you post it here, or at least link to it.
There's one at @renaudrenaud 's.Just wondering. Do all of you have carpet on the floor? As amirm said, this speaker produces lots of vertical reflections. I personally find it much better after placing carpet on the floor. Maybe it even allows more toe in?
Just wondering. Do all of you have carpet on the floor? As amirm said, this speaker produces lots of vertical reflections. I personally find it much better after placing carpet on the floor. Maybe it even allows more toe in?
Is it close to a wall?New to this forum and HiFi in general. Just bought these ELAC's to replace late 1980's B&W DM110i. At higher volumes these truly shine! Mid/highs clear and are well balanced with the bass. As I turn the volume down to more relaxing volume levels (where I tend to listen most frequently), the bass signal takes over the room. It's not boomy, but fatiguing. I need to turn my receiver bass setting down to -6 or turn on the high pass filter on zone2 of my Denon receiver, which I don't need to do with my trusty B&W's. Anyway, just curious if this is something I should be concerned with, or just set it and forget it? Love the sound with high pass filter activated, but I've always had that set at neutral with my other speakers.