I think as long as the page remains, we are way ahead of where we were before.
It's a start. Get some other Wiki entries that link to ASR and voila more reputability.I think as long as the page remains, we are way ahead of where we were before.
Oh, I am mentioned in a few other wikis:It's a start. Get some other Wiki entries that link to ASR and voila more reputability.
As much as I can see as a simple Wiki user your name at those web links could be a link back to ASR and vice versa and lead to having your own dedicated Wiki entry. Maybe your own Wiki entry needs to come first. I don't know. The Wikipedia process is so rule oriented and the rules and reg's are au' plenty.Oh, I am mentioned in a few other wikis:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Media_Audio
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Content
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdvFS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnomedex
Can any of these be used to crosslink?
It's all gratis/gratuito work from what I can tell.Do they pay you to be on Wiki?
It's all gratis/gratuito work from what I can tell.
Hmmzski. Well somebody needs to admin the entire show. It's huge.
I never knew that. I was Visa'ing them money too. They make it sound so desperate.I used to donate to them only to find out that they were fully funded by major corporations! Donations were pocket money for other things. So I stopped.
Me too for the same reasons.I used to donate to them only to find out that they were fully funded by major corporations! Donations were pocket money for other things. So I stopped.
It's a start for sure! I want to see links throughout Wikipedia and this is the start. Hopefully it is a published success.I will consider this a win. We all learned new things about Wikipedia, and although severely curtailed, we do have an ASR entry. Good first steps.
This gives some perspective on Wikimedia's finances:Me too for the same reasons. ...
I will consider this a win. We all learned new things about Wikipedia, and although severely curtailed, we do have an ASR entry. Good first steps.
Good catch! Here is the correct URL: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/audiosciencereview.comUnder References...looking at 1st source:
It links to Alexa's page, but for audioholics.com ??
Under References...looking at 1st source:
It links to Alexa's page, but for audioholics.com ??
Fixed.Good catch! Here is the correct URL: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/audiosciencereview.com