I understand your point and I am not saying it is wrong, on the contrary. I am just saying that it is misleading to have a "bad" panther or a "not recommended" at the end for speakers that have very good measures overall but a not flat frequency response, since the newbie reader could understand that the speaker is not good while in fact, it is just not balanced, but being not balanced is not something wrong, it is just something different, that some of us may be liking.
As I said above, I understand the science behind it, and I am a strong supporter of the scientific method also in the audio field, I just think that it applies better to electronics, or at least it does not apply so well when talking about frequency response. I certainly don't want a speaker that has distortion, or bad directivity, or resonances, and so on, but maybe I do prefer a speaker with elevated bass frequencies, or maybe higher highs. That is the same reasoning I apply on headphones, some of us may prefer V-shaped, others U, others Y, and others flat, it also depends on the musical genres that you like the most. So, in my opinion, reviews should be ended with the preference score and so on as it is done, but also with a judgment that does not include frequency response, leaving that decision to the customer.