Currently my ears cannot detect the difference between DX3Pro and D50 D50s. However, there is a slight difference between these devices and the M500.
It's like comparing a photo taken with an iPhone to a photo taken with a single-lens reflex digital camera. Both look beautiful, but there are differences.
Currently I am 68 years old and I can only hear treble up to 13.5kHz. In the past, a large Japanese electronics company designed audio and video equipment for TV broadcasters. Therefore, you can distinguish slight differences in sound. However, the points I check are different from those checked by audiophiles. I always refer to the measured values of ASR and compare them as electronic devices.
Hello !
Thanks for your feedback. I am also 68 years old
. In my opinion, the sound of the D50 and dx3 is different. The music on the D50 sounds softer and completely tireless. + It’s good to listen as a background, doing household chores.
On dx3, small details are more noticeable, the sound is more dynamic, lively and emotional. The feeling of being in the concert hall and it is a bit tiring. I think the dx3 sound is more realistic.
Of course, my conclusions are subjective IMHO.
I am an electronic engineer and first of all I look at the objective parameters and measure on my own. But often, the sound of a device with remarkable parameters is inferior to competitors.