• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Tannoy System 600 Speaker Review

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,281
Location
Oxford, England
@MZKM is the exclusion of this speaker from your preference table deliberate or accidental?
 

jhaider

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
2,822
Likes
4,514
Mr. jhaider, may I ask, does the coaxial driver in my Definition DC10A’s use ferrofluid? If so, when and how should I expect to replace it?

I think so but I don’t know. I haven’t paid much attention to the retro models.
 

raindance

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
1,037
Likes
968
My company, a Pro-AV dealer, has been selling Tannoy for years. The System 600, System 800 and others in that series were never highly regarded, but the general consensus was that they gave a certain flavor to recordings due to their inaccuracies. They seemed to get used by a fair number of studios. My recollection of the sound was one that emphasized the punch of snare drums and percussion, such as toms, but was quite polite in the treble. The System 600 was designed for nearfield use and I was always told that you couldn't use them in a conventional stereo system that placed them in the midfield. Around the time these were popular, Tannoy was also selling a line of PA speakers (the i- series) that required a "special" EQ - one wonders if these were trickled down from those horrors (they were truly bad without EQ).
 

infinitesymphony

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 21, 2018
Messages
1,072
Likes
1,806
Even though the measured speaker's frequency response is pretty bad, it looks like there are still directivity benefits of having a point source design. I spent some time with a group of people crowded into a critical listening room that had two pairs of speakers: Tannoy 800A and B&W 802D. The Tannoys were an easy pick because they sounded better to more people across the room.
 

raindance

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
1,037
Likes
968
Even though the measured speaker's frequency response is pretty bad, it looks like there are still directivity benefits of having a point source design. I spent some time with a group of people crowded into a critical listening room that had two pairs of speakers: Tannoy 800A and B&W 802D. The Tannoys were an easy pick because they sounded better to more people across the room.

The 800A was active - it would be interesting to measure that one. There was a 600 active also.
 

KSTR

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,690
Likes
6,012
Location
Berlin, Germany
I have those SYS600A actives, and when I measured them (10yrs back, last time) the frequency response was spot on the published graph in the manual -- with significant smoothing, at least 1/6th octave IIRC.
Btw, it is very unfair to measure coaxials exactly 100% on-axis because of the strict symmetry which accumulates all the same minute error (diffraction, mostly) whereas in a non-axisymmetric speaker much of the fine-grain averages out as diffraction contribution varies vs rotational angle.
 

raindance

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
1,037
Likes
968
I have those SYS600A actives, and when I measured them (10yrs back, last time) the frequency response was spot on the published graph in the manual -- with significant smoothing, at least 1/6th octave IIRC.
Btw, it is very unfair to measure coaxials exactly 100% on-axis because of the strict symmetry which accumulates all the same minute error (diffraction, mostly) whereas in a non-axisymmetric speaker much of the fine-grain averages out as diffraction contribution varies vs rotational angle.
Would you agree that they provide a really punchy snare sound? I liked them on female vocals also. I'd guess the actives are better than the passives.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2021
Messages
19
Likes
42
This speaker was measured in March 2021 by Indy Acoustic Research in an article by Steve Temme from Listen, Inc. who wrote the "Simulated Free Field Measurements" paper with Christopher J. Struck (both AES members). They used the SoundCheck software from Listen, Inc. and an SCM measurement microphone.

20210607182018_Figure3-Listen-Splice-Measurements.png

Anechoic and simulated free-field measurements of a Tannoy System 600 speaker.

20210607182018_Figure4-Listen-Splice-Measurements.png

Tannoy published frequency compared to spliced measurement.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2021
Messages
19
Likes
42
I aligned the two graphs on the X and Y axis and generated an animated GIF. There is some correlation above 3 kHz but not much else:

tannoy-overlay.gif


Outside of the crossover problem, has anybody an idea why the bass is dropping earlier on Amir's measurement?

@amirm Would you like to measure or recap the crossover as mentioned by @QMuse and @Vuki... for science? ;)
 

Olie5

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2023
Messages
2
Likes
5
I have these speakers myself. A friend and I took a deeper look at these speakers and did measurements. At first the graph looked liked yours, after measuring the tweeter and woofer separately we saw the crossover should be adequate for the driver design. In the datasheet of the speakers is also an almost flat response, which is weird (see picture)
tannoy response.jpg

We tried flipping the polarity of the woofer around and were blown away. Now the measurements were matching the datasheet and the dip at 1.5k was gone. Could there have been a mistake in the design and the + and - swapped? After reinstalling in my setup I heard a lot more bass, my subwoofer and speakers were also out of phase. The sub is a JBL controll sb-5 so it is passive, didn't think of the polarity before. If this was a mistake in the design at tannoy I think its a major flaw. Maybe if you still have the speakers, you can retry the measurements and come to the same conclusion?
 

MediumRare

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Messages
1,949
Likes
2,275
Location
Chicago
I have these speakers myself. A friend and I took a deeper look at these speakers and did measurements. At first the graph looked liked yours, after measuring the tweeter and woofer separately we saw the crossover should be adequate for the driver design. In the datasheet of the speakers is also an almost flat response, which is weird (see picture)View attachment 285591
We tried flipping the polarity of the woofer around and were blown away. Now the measurements were matching the datasheet and the dip at 1.5k was gone. Could there have been a mistake in the design and the + and - swapped? After reinstalling in my setup I heard a lot more bass, my subwoofer and speakers were also out of phase. The sub is a JBL controll sb-5 so it is passive, didn't think of the polarity before. If this was a mistake in the design at tannoy I think its a major flaw. Maybe if you still have the speakers, you can retry the measurements and come to the same conclusion?
Can you show us REW graphs?
 
Top Bottom