• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

AKG K371 Impressions

pwjazz

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
507
Likes
746
TLDR;
Comfortable, well enough built, decent isolation, easy to drive, sounds good as-is and great with EQ.

Build, Accessories and Comfort
Built entirely out of matte plastic and vinyl, the K371 doesn’t look or feel premium the way that my DT 1990 does. Even my HD58X feels a bit more premium with its glossy plastic and metal accents. Looks notwithstanding, the K371 has a pleasing heft without feeling heavy, and it does feel solidly made. The unique adjustment mechanism works well enough, though I’d like it to hold its size a bit better. The headband doesn’t cause any hotspotting and the pads are large and well padded enough to accommodate my ears without irritation. Clamping force seems just right.

The K371 has a single-sided headphone entry using a 3 pin Mini XLR connector. I’m used to this kind of connector from the DT 1990 and it’s probably my favorite. Being single sided keeps the cable away from my hands while working, the Mini XLR jack is more durable and secure than 2.5mm or 3.5mm connectors like on Hifiman but easier to plug/unplug than the connectors on my HD58X, and it’s easy to find affordable Mini XLR cables. Being only a single-sided 3 pin MiniXLR, it doesn’t allow for switching to balanced cables, which is no problem for me but something to be aware of.

The K371 ships with 3 cables, a short, a long and a coiled. The connectors on the cables seem sturdy and have adequate strain relief, and I appreciate the screw-on 1/4" adapters. The cables themselves do seem a bit thin and I worry about their durability. Thankfully they can be easily replaced if that becomes necessary.

Isolation
I haven’t heard a lot of closed back headphones. Before I got deep into headphones as a hobby I owned the Panasonic RP-HTX7-W1, but can’t remember much about how it sounded. Later I had the Sennheiser HD598Cs which I remember sounding better, but I rarely chose it over my open backs and it eventually got run over by a car. Compared to what I remember of those, the K371 isolates well. It doesn’t completely shut out the outside world the way that my Etymotic HF5s do, but it does a good job of blocking out people talking in the next room and makes it easy for me to listen at low volumes.

Amping
The K371 needs less power than my HD58X and DT 1990. The only bummer is that the low impedance doesn’t trigger the high output mode on my LG V20 so I have to trick it into doing that using something like this 80ohm impedance adapter.

Sound
In a nutshell, the K371 sounds good but not perfect, and it can be easily eq’d to sound great. For casual listening (movies, background music and such) I’m okay without EQ, but for focused listening I’d take an un-eq’d HD58X over this. With EQ, they’re both great.

Bass
Note - the K371 seems fairly sensitive to seal. I wear glasses and need to make sure to press on the ear cups after putting this headphone on to get a good seal. Thankfully it stays in place so I don’t have to keep my hands on the whole time I’m listening!

It seems like every closed back I’ve heard (especially the HD598Cs) has a scooped upper bass region that makes it sound hollow and echoey. The K371 doesn’t completely escape this fate, but it does better than the 598Cs for sure. It’s got very good sub-bass extension and I even find the sub-bass a little too much at times. It creates that sense of pressure that I get from something like the LCD2C but when combined with the hollowed out bass it sounds a bit artificial and detached. Daft’ Punks Get Luck and Rage’s Killing in the Name demonstrate what I’m talking about here–the bass lines create a lot of pressure and a little bit of punch, but they completely lack any of the fullness and warmth that I associate with those low frequencies. I think this is what people mean when they talk about “detached” bass.

Mids
The K371’s mids seem very well balanced. Listening to acoustic music like Joni Mitchell’s Little Green, the guitar and vocals are well balanced, clear and have a very natural timbre. They lack a bit of fullness because of the aforementioned issues in the upper bass, and the upper midrange can get a little shouty, which I can notice on female choral vocals like on R.I.A.S. Kammerchor’s Bach Motets and on trumpet like on Freddie Hubbard’s Red Clay, but especially at lower volumes this isn’t too bothersome.

Highs
The theme of good but not perfect continues in the treble. It’s well extended, fairly even handed and doesn’t exaggerate sibilants. Strings sound airy and cymbals sound realistic. If I were to nitpick, listening to something like Phronesis live version of Eight Hours, cymbals sound a tad softer (splashier) than I like and piano sounds a little less brilliant than I imagine it.

Imaging/Separation/Soundstage
The K371 sounds like headphones. As usual for me, crossfeed helps it sound a little more natural. Separation is good, even on busy stuff like Kleiber’s performance of Beehoven’s 5th. Some people say closed backs sound more claustrophobic than open backs. Compared to the HD58X and DT 1990, the K371 honestly sounds pretty similarl. My LCD2C sounds “bigger” but I think that’s mostly because it has much deeper pads.

Distortion/Volume Handing
I can turn the K371 up louder than I’m comfortable with and I don’t notice any grain or other problems that I do hear when cranking the volume on headphones like the HD58X.

EQ
I love to EQ. The K371 makes a great platform for EQ because the place it needs EQ the most is the bass, which also happens to be the easiest region measure and EQ. The mids and treble are pretty close to my idea of “right”, which is good because these can be tougher to tune.
Here’s what I’m running right now:
Low Shelf 40Hz Q1 -3.5dB - Brings the sub-bass pressure to a level that I consider more natural
Peak 65Hz Q2 +3dB - Fills in a dip in the bass to add some punch
Peak 153Hz Q3 +2dB - Fills in a hole in the upper bass to get rid of the hollowness
Peak 5900Hz Q5 +3dB - Brings up the low treble to add brilliance to piano and that “metal” sound to cymbals
(Optional) Peak 80Hz Q0.25 +2dB - Adds some warmth if you’re into a warmer sound. Works well in conjunction with crossfeed which tends to soften bass.
(Optional) Peak 2100Hz Q3.5 -1.5dB - Reduces some shout, useful when listening at higher volumes, less so at lower volumes.

Frequency Response Measurements, Comparison to HD598Cs
Made on a non-industry-standard MiniDSP E.A.R.S. with issues at 4 KHz and above, take with a grain of salt. Uses HEQ compensation (similar to Harman target) and 1/12 octave smoothing

comparison.jpg


The K371 has a more even frequency response from bass through to the upper mids, after which point the measurements start to converge. It does also show somewhat better treble extension. Both are far from perfect in the bass, I'm assuming because of the closed back design.
 

VintageFlanker

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,940
Likes
19,691
Location
Paris
TLDR;
Comfortable, well enough built, decent isolation, easy to drive, sounds good as-is and great with EQ.

Build, Accessories and Comfort
Built entirely out of matte plastic and vinyl, the K371 doesn’t look or feel premium the way that my DT 1990 does. Even my HD58X feels a bit more premium with its glossy plastic and metal accents. Looks notwithstanding, the K371 has a pleasing heft without feeling heavy, and it does feel solidly made. The unique adjustment mechanism works well enough, though I’d like it to hold its size a bit better. The headband doesn’t cause any hotspotting and the pads are large and well padded enough to accommodate my ears without irritation. Clamping force seems just right.

The K371 has a single-sided headphone entry using a 3 pin Mini XLR connector. I’m used to this kind of connector from the DT 1990 and it’s probably my favorite. Being single sided keeps the cable away from my hands while working, the Mini XLR jack is more durable and secure than 2.5mm or 3.5mm connectors like on Hifiman but easier to plug/unplug than the connectors on my HD58X, and it’s easy to find affordable Mini XLR cables. Being only a single-sided 3 pin MiniXLR, it doesn’t allow for switching to balanced cables, which is no problem for me but something to be aware of.

The K371 ships with 3 cables, a short, a long and a coiled. The connectors on the cables seem sturdy and have adequate strain relief, and I appreciate the screw-on 1/4" adapters. The cables themselves do seem a bit thin and I worry about their durability. Thankfully they can be easily replaced if that becomes necessary.

Isolation
I haven’t heard a lot of closed back headphones. Before I got deep into headphones as a hobby I owned the Panasonic RP-HTX7-W1, but can’t remember much about how it sounded. Later I had the Sennheiser HD598Cs which I remember sounding better, but I rarely chose it over my open backs and it eventually got run over by a car. Compared to what I remember of those, the K371 isolates well. It doesn’t completely shut out the outside world the way that my Etymotic HF5s do, but it does a good job of blocking out people talking in the next room and makes it easy for me to listen at low volumes.

Amping
The K371 needs less power than my HD58X and DT 1990. The only bummer is that the low impedance doesn’t trigger the high output mode on my LG V20 so I have to trick it into doing that using something like this 80ohm impedance adapter.

Sound
In a nutshell, the K371 sounds good but not perfect, and it can be easily eq’d to sound great. For casual listening (movies, background music and such) I’m okay without EQ, but for focused listening I’d take an un-eq’d HD58X over this. With EQ, they’re both great.

Bass
Note - the K371 seems fairly sensitive to seal. I wear glasses and need to make sure to press on the ear cups after putting this headphone on to get a good seal. Thankfully it stays in place so I don’t have to keep my hands on the whole time I’m listening!

It seems like every closed back I’ve heard (especially the HD598Cs) has a scooped upper bass region that makes it sound hollow and echoey. The K371 doesn’t completely escape this fate, but it does better than the 598Cs for sure. It’s got very good sub-bass extension and I even find the sub-bass a little too much at times. It creates that sense of pressure that I get from something like the LCD2C but when combined with the hollowed out bass it sounds a bit artificial and detached. Daft’ Punks Get Luck and Rage’s Killing in the Name demonstrate what I’m talking about here–the bass lines create a lot of pressure and a little bit of punch, but they completely lack any of the fullness and warmth that I associate with those low frequencies. I think this is what people mean when they talk about “detached” bass.

Mids
The K371’s mids seem very well balanced. Listening to acoustic music like Joni Mitchell’s Little Green, the guitar and vocals are well balanced, clear and have a very natural timbre. They lack a bit of fullness because of the aforementioned issues in the upper bass, and the upper midrange can get a little shouty, which I can notice on female choral vocals like on R.I.A.S. Kammerchor’s Bach Motets and on trumpet like on Freddie Hubbard’s Red Clay, but especially at lower volumes this isn’t too bothersome.

Highs
The theme of good but not perfect continues in the treble. It’s well extended, fairly even handed and doesn’t exaggerate sibilants. Strings sound airy and cymbals sound realistic. If I were to nitpick, listening to something like Phronesis live version of Eight Hours, cymbals sound a tad softer (splashier) than I like and piano sounds a little less brilliant than I imagine it.

Imaging/Separation/Soundstage
The K371 sounds like headphones. As usual for me, crossfeed helps it sound a little more natural. Separation is good, even on busy stuff like Kleiber’s performance of Beehoven’s 5th. Some people say closed backs sound more claustrophobic than open backs. Compared to the HD58X and DT 1990, the K371 honestly sounds pretty similarl. My LCD2C sounds “bigger” but I think that’s mostly because it has much deeper pads.

Distortion/Volume Handing
I can turn the K371 up louder than I’m comfortable with and I don’t notice any grain or other problems that I do hear when cranking the volume on headphones like the HD58X.

EQ
I love to EQ. The K371 makes a great platform for EQ because the place it needs EQ the most is the bass, which also happens to be the easiest region measure and EQ. The mids and treble are pretty close to my idea of “right”, which is good because these can be tougher to tune.
Here’s what I’m running right now:
Low Shelf 40Hz Q1 -3.5dB - Brings the sub-bass pressure to a level that I consider more natural
Peak 65Hz Q2 +3dB - Fills in a dip in the bass to add some punch
Peak 153Hz Q3 +2dB - Fills in a hole in the upper bass to get rid of the hollowness
Peak 5900Hz Q5 +3dB - Brings up the low treble to add brilliance to piano and that “metal” sound to cymbals
(Optional) Peak 80Hz Q0.25 +2dB - Adds some warmth if you’re into a warmer sound. Works well in conjunction with crossfeed which tends to soften bass.
(Optional) Peak 2100Hz Q3.5 -1.5dB - Reduces some shout, useful when listening at higher volumes, less so at lower volumes.

Frequency Response Measurements, Comparison to HD598Cs
Made on a non-industry-standard MiniDSP E.A.R.S. with issues at 4 KHz and above, take with a grain of salt. Uses HEQ compensation (similar to Harman target) and 1/12 octave smoothing

View attachment 33231

The K371 has a more even frequency response from bass through to the upper mids, after which point the measurements start to converge. It does also show somewhat better treble extension. Both are far from perfect in the bass, I'm assuming because of the closed back design.
The Frequency response looks very good in my book. The sub bass is boosted only until 40Hz, so it wouldn't bleed into the mids, in theory.

Others MINIDSP measurements from reddit (don't know if it's yours):

S8TGFSP.jpg

ZrAiGL0.jpg


I've heard from Oluv that the 6Khz deep is probably a measurement error from the MiniDSP.

Is there any way @solderdude get the K371 for review on DIY Audio Heaven?
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,891
Likes
35,912
Location
The Neitherlands
I don't have an AKG dealer in my 'collection' so would have to buy one and sell it again.
It doesn't feel right to me to burden sellers with returned items on purpose.

Most likely the 6kHz dip is a measurement error.
 

VintageFlanker

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,940
Likes
19,691
Location
Paris
I don't have an AKG dealer in my 'collection' so would have to buy one and sell it again.
Would you accept loan? I think I'm going to buy one, considering the low price (145€ shipped). I may consider to send mine to The Netherlands. How much time would you keep headphones for the time of a review?
 
OP
pwjazz

pwjazz

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
507
Likes
746
The Frequency response looks very good in my book. The sub bass is boosted only until 40Hz, so it wouldn't bleed into the mids, in theory.

Others MINIDSP measurements from reddit (don't know if it's yours):

S8TGFSP.jpg

ZrAiGL0.jpg


I've heard from Oluv that the 6Khz deep is probably a measurement error from the MiniDSP.

Is there any way @solderdude get the K371 for review on DIY Audio Heaven?

Haha yeah that's my measurement I think. Considering that the 6KHz hole looks almost identical for both headphones I agree that it's likely a measurement artifact. Could be the power of autosuggestion but when I boost a few dB in that area cymbals sound better to me. Will be nice to see some professional measurements.
 

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,408
Location
Seattle Area, USA
I used to have a pair, but found them to make my ears hot when wearing them over extended periods (1+ hr), which isn't an issue I have with the K7XX.

This obviously will vary from person to person.

Other than that, good neutral sound for the price, IMHO.
 

Fregly

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Messages
336
Likes
264
The 361 looks interesting in terms of monitor flat, mostly. I believe I'll get a pair. The price is certainly worth the try.
 

Spech

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
33
Likes
24
TLDR;
Comfortable, well enough built, decent isolation, easy to drive, sounds good as-is and great with EQ.

Build, Accessories and Comfort
Built entirely out of matte plastic and vinyl, the K371 doesn’t look or feel premium the way that my DT 1990 does. Even my HD58X feels a bit more premium with its glossy plastic and metal accents. Looks notwithstanding, the K371 has a pleasing heft without feeling heavy, and it does feel solidly made. The unique adjustment mechanism works well enough, though I’d like it to hold its size a bit better. The headband doesn’t cause any hotspotting and the pads are large and well padded enough to accommodate my ears without irritation. Clamping force seems just right.

The K371 has a single-sided headphone entry using a 3 pin Mini XLR connector. I’m used to this kind of connector from the DT 1990 and it’s probably my favorite. Being single sided keeps the cable away from my hands while working, the Mini XLR jack is more durable and secure than 2.5mm or 3.5mm connectors like on Hifiman but easier to plug/unplug than the connectors on my HD58X, and it’s easy to find affordable Mini XLR cables. Being only a single-sided 3 pin MiniXLR, it doesn’t allow for switching to balanced cables, which is no problem for me but something to be aware of.

The K371 ships with 3 cables, a short, a long and a coiled. The connectors on the cables seem sturdy and have adequate strain relief, and I appreciate the screw-on 1/4" adapters. The cables themselves do seem a bit thin and I worry about their durability. Thankfully they can be easily replaced if that becomes necessary.

Isolation
I haven’t heard a lot of closed back headphones. Before I got deep into headphones as a hobby I owned the Panasonic RP-HTX7-W1, but can’t remember much about how it sounded. Later I had the Sennheiser HD598Cs which I remember sounding better, but I rarely chose it over my open backs and it eventually got run over by a car. Compared to what I remember of those, the K371 isolates well. It doesn’t completely shut out the outside world the way that my Etymotic HF5s do, but it does a good job of blocking out people talking in the next room and makes it easy for me to listen at low volumes.

Amping
The K371 needs less power than my HD58X and DT 1990. The only bummer is that the low impedance doesn’t trigger the high output mode on my LG V20 so I have to trick it into doing that using something like this 80ohm impedance adapter.

Sound
In a nutshell, the K371 sounds good but not perfect, and it can be easily eq’d to sound great. For casual listening (movies, background music and such) I’m okay without EQ, but for focused listening I’d take an un-eq’d HD58X over this. With EQ, they’re both great.

Bass
Note - the K371 seems fairly sensitive to seal. I wear glasses and need to make sure to press on the ear cups after putting this headphone on to get a good seal. Thankfully it stays in place so I don’t have to keep my hands on the whole time I’m listening!

It seems like every closed back I’ve heard (especially the HD598Cs) has a scooped upper bass region that makes it sound hollow and echoey. The K371 doesn’t completely escape this fate, but it does better than the 598Cs for sure. It’s got very good sub-bass extension and I even find the sub-bass a little too much at times. It creates that sense of pressure that I get from something like the LCD2C but when combined with the hollowed out bass it sounds a bit artificial and detached. Daft’ Punks Get Luck and Rage’s Killing in the Name demonstrate what I’m talking about here–the bass lines create a lot of pressure and a little bit of punch, but they completely lack any of the fullness and warmth that I associate with those low frequencies. I think this is what people mean when they talk about “detached” bass.

Mids
The K371’s mids seem very well balanced. Listening to acoustic music like Joni Mitchell’s Little Green, the guitar and vocals are well balanced, clear and have a very natural timbre. They lack a bit of fullness because of the aforementioned issues in the upper bass, and the upper midrange can get a little shouty, which I can notice on female choral vocals like on R.I.A.S. Kammerchor’s Bach Motets and on trumpet like on Freddie Hubbard’s Red Clay, but especially at lower volumes this isn’t too bothersome.

Highs
The theme of good but not perfect continues in the treble. It’s well extended, fairly even handed and doesn’t exaggerate sibilants. Strings sound airy and cymbals sound realistic. If I were to nitpick, listening to something like Phronesis live version of Eight Hours, cymbals sound a tad softer (splashier) than I like and piano sounds a little less brilliant than I imagine it.

Imaging/Separation/Soundstage
The K371 sounds like headphones. As usual for me, crossfeed helps it sound a little more natural. Separation is good, even on busy stuff like Kleiber’s performance of Beehoven’s 5th. Some people say closed backs sound more claustrophobic than open backs. Compared to the HD58X and DT 1990, the K371 honestly sounds pretty similarl. My LCD2C sounds “bigger” but I think that’s mostly because it has much deeper pads.

Distortion/Volume Handing
I can turn the K371 up louder than I’m comfortable with and I don’t notice any grain or other problems that I do hear when cranking the volume on headphones like the HD58X.

EQ
I love to EQ. The K371 makes a great platform for EQ because the place it needs EQ the most is the bass, which also happens to be the easiest region measure and EQ. The mids and treble are pretty close to my idea of “right”, which is good because these can be tougher to tune.
Here’s what I’m running right now:
Low Shelf 40Hz Q1 -3.5dB - Brings the sub-bass pressure to a level that I consider more natural
Peak 65Hz Q2 +3dB - Fills in a dip in the bass to add some punch
Peak 153Hz Q3 +2dB - Fills in a hole in the upper bass to get rid of the hollowness
Peak 5900Hz Q5 +3dB - Brings up the low treble to add brilliance to piano and that “metal” sound to cymbals
(Optional) Peak 80Hz Q0.25 +2dB - Adds some warmth if you’re into a warmer sound. Works well in conjunction with crossfeed which tends to soften bass.
(Optional) Peak 2100Hz Q3.5 -1.5dB - Reduces some shout, useful when listening at higher volumes, less so at lower volumes.

Frequency Response Measurements, Comparison to HD598Cs
Made on a non-industry-standard MiniDSP E.A.R.S. with issues at 4 KHz and above, take with a grain of salt. Uses HEQ compensation (similar to Harman target) and 1/12 octave smoothing

View attachment 33231

The K371 has a more even frequency response from bass through to the upper mids, after which point the measurements start to converge. It does also show somewhat better treble extension. Both are far from perfect in the bass, I'm assuming because of the closed back design.
Could you do a frequency response graph with the 58x and the K371, like you did with it and the 598Cs, that would be really helpful since the 58x are reference headphones for many people including me, thanks!
 

VintageFlanker

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,940
Likes
19,691
Location
Paris
Could you do a frequency response graph with the 58x and the K371, like you did with it and the 598Cs, that would be really helpful since the 58x are reference headphones for many people including me, thanks!
There are tons of FR graphs for the 58X out there, all indeed showing a reference curve.

Oluv's measurements with same compensation for both headphones (either the K371 and 58X Jubilee are black line) :
Again, K371:
Capture d’écran (315).png

58X: (blue line is HD600, BTW)
Screenshot_20191002-203531_YouTube.jpg
 

Spech

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
33
Likes
24
Thanks for that but Oluv's freq graph of the K371 is kinda strange especially if you compare it to Pwjazz's freq graph for it, I believe he said he couldnt measure them properly in his video or something like that, thats why I wanted Pwjazz to make a freq graph.
 

VintageFlanker

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,940
Likes
19,691
Location
Paris
Thanks for that but Oluv's freq graph of the K371 is kinda strange especially if you compare it to Pwjazz's freq graph for it,
How is it strange? Oluv has a very professional approach (with his own resources). He worked quite a long time to get what he thinks to be the most accurate compensation.

I believe he said he couldnt measure them properly in his video or something like that,
. Sure, and what he said is meaningful. He explains that placement of pads was crucial, in short: these headphones have a rather poor frequency response consistency. That also what I heard with my pair, BTW.
 

Spech

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
33
Likes
24
Oof, yeah I got that but I want a graph of what they are supposed to sound when positioned properly (which seems to be pwjazz's measurement since it looks pretty similar to oluv's 58x measurement and other headphones measured with the ears) and compared to a graph of the 58x, its really helpful to know that they are sensitive to fit tho
 
Last edited:
OP
pwjazz

pwjazz

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
507
Likes
746
Could you do a frequency response graph with the 58x and the K371, like you did with it and the 598Cs, that would be really helpful since the 58x are reference headphones for many people including me, thanks!

Here you go. HD58X in Red, K371 in Blue, Harman-like HEQ compensation on MiniDSP E.A.R.S. Generally this is kind of how I hear it, HD58X is warmer/fuller in the bass but rolled off in the sub-bass, K371 is more forward in the upper mids and
brighter in the treble. Don't pay too much mind to the specific peaks in dips in the treble, as the E.A.R.S. isn't super accurate in this area.

hd58x_k371.jpg


these headphones have a rather poor frequency response consistency

Yes, they are a bit all over the place. Especially sub-bass is particularly sensitive to proper seal (not unusual on closed back headphones). Here are the measurements that I averaged to come up with the single line above:

consistency.jpg
 

Spech

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
33
Likes
24
TLDR;
Comfortable, well enough built, decent isolation, easy to drive, sounds good as-is and great with EQ.

Build, Accessories and Comfort
Built entirely out of matte plastic and vinyl, the K371 doesn’t look or feel premium the way that my DT 1990 does. Even my HD58X feels a bit more premium with its glossy plastic and metal accents. Looks notwithstanding, the K371 has a pleasing heft without feeling heavy, and it does feel solidly made. The unique adjustment mechanism works well enough, though I’d like it to hold its size a bit better. The headband doesn’t cause any hotspotting and the pads are large and well padded enough to accommodate my ears without irritation. Clamping force seems just right.

The K371 has a single-sided headphone entry using a 3 pin Mini XLR connector. I’m used to this kind of connector from the DT 1990 and it’s probably my favorite. Being single sided keeps the cable away from my hands while working, the Mini XLR jack is more durable and secure than 2.5mm or 3.5mm connectors like on Hifiman but easier to plug/unplug than the connectors on my HD58X, and it’s easy to find affordable Mini XLR cables. Being only a single-sided 3 pin MiniXLR, it doesn’t allow for switching to balanced cables, which is no problem for me but something to be aware of.

The K371 ships with 3 cables, a short, a long and a coiled. The connectors on the cables seem sturdy and have adequate strain relief, and I appreciate the screw-on 1/4" adapters. The cables themselves do seem a bit thin and I worry about their durability. Thankfully they can be easily replaced if that becomes necessary.

Isolation
I haven’t heard a lot of closed back headphones. Before I got deep into headphones as a hobby I owned the Panasonic RP-HTX7-W1, but can’t remember much about how it sounded. Later I had the Sennheiser HD598Cs which I remember sounding better, but I rarely chose it over my open backs and it eventually got run over by a car. Compared to what I remember of those, the K371 isolates well. It doesn’t completely shut out the outside world the way that my Etymotic HF5s do, but it does a good job of blocking out people talking in the next room and makes it easy for me to listen at low volumes.

Amping
The K371 needs less power than my HD58X and DT 1990. The only bummer is that the low impedance doesn’t trigger the high output mode on my LG V20 so I have to trick it into doing that using something like this 80ohm impedance adapter.

Sound
In a nutshell, the K371 sounds good but not perfect, and it can be easily eq’d to sound great. For casual listening (movies, background music and such) I’m okay without EQ, but for focused listening I’d take an un-eq’d HD58X over this. With EQ, they’re both great.

Bass
Note - the K371 seems fairly sensitive to seal. I wear glasses and need to make sure to press on the ear cups after putting this headphone on to get a good seal. Thankfully it stays in place so I don’t have to keep my hands on the whole time I’m listening!

It seems like every closed back I’ve heard (especially the HD598Cs) has a scooped upper bass region that makes it sound hollow and echoey. The K371 doesn’t completely escape this fate, but it does better than the 598Cs for sure. It’s got very good sub-bass extension and I even find the sub-bass a little too much at times. It creates that sense of pressure that I get from something like the LCD2C but when combined with the hollowed out bass it sounds a bit artificial and detached. Daft’ Punks Get Luck and Rage’s Killing in the Name demonstrate what I’m talking about here–the bass lines create a lot of pressure and a little bit of punch, but they completely lack any of the fullness and warmth that I associate with those low frequencies. I think this is what people mean when they talk about “detached” bass.

Mids
The K371’s mids seem very well balanced. Listening to acoustic music like Joni Mitchell’s Little Green, the guitar and vocals are well balanced, clear and have a very natural timbre. They lack a bit of fullness because of the aforementioned issues in the upper bass, and the upper midrange can get a little shouty, which I can notice on female choral vocals like on R.I.A.S. Kammerchor’s Bach Motets and on trumpet like on Freddie Hubbard’s Red Clay, but especially at lower volumes this isn’t too bothersome.

Highs
The theme of good but not perfect continues in the treble. It’s well extended, fairly even handed and doesn’t exaggerate sibilants. Strings sound airy and cymbals sound realistic. If I were to nitpick, listening to something like Phronesis live version of Eight Hours, cymbals sound a tad softer (splashier) than I like and piano sounds a little less brilliant than I imagine it.

Imaging/Separation/Soundstage
The K371 sounds like headphones. As usual for me, crossfeed helps it sound a little more natural. Separation is good, even on busy stuff like Kleiber’s performance of Beehoven’s 5th. Some people say closed backs sound more claustrophobic than open backs. Compared to the HD58X and DT 1990, the K371 honestly sounds pretty similarl. My LCD2C sounds “bigger” but I think that’s mostly because it has much deeper pads.

Distortion/Volume Handing
I can turn the K371 up louder than I’m comfortable with and I don’t notice any grain or other problems that I do hear when cranking the volume on headphones like the HD58X.

EQ
I love to EQ. The K371 makes a great platform for EQ because the place it needs EQ the most is the bass, which also happens to be the easiest region measure and EQ. The mids and treble are pretty close to my idea of “right”, which is good because these can be tougher to tune.
Here’s what I’m running right now:
Low Shelf 40Hz Q1 -3.5dB - Brings the sub-bass pressure to a level that I consider more natural
Peak 65Hz Q2 +3dB - Fills in a dip in the bass to add some punch
Peak 153Hz Q3 +2dB - Fills in a hole in the upper bass to get rid of the hollowness
Peak 5900Hz Q5 +3dB - Brings up the low treble to add brilliance to piano and that “metal” sound to cymbals
(Optional) Peak 80Hz Q0.25 +2dB - Adds some warmth if you’re into a warmer sound. Works well in conjunction with crossfeed which tends to soften bass.
(Optional) Peak 2100Hz Q3.5 -1.5dB - Reduces some shout, useful when listening at higher volumes, less so at lower volumes.

Frequency Response Measurements, Comparison to HD598Cs
Made on a non-industry-standard MiniDSP E.A.R.S. with issues at 4 KHz and above, take with a grain of salt. Uses HEQ compensation (similar to Harman target) and 1/12 octave smoothing

View attachment 33231

The K371 has a more even frequency response from bass through to the upper mids, after which point the measurements start to converge. It does also show somewhat better treble extension. Both are far from perfect in the bass, I'm assuming because of the closed back design.
So I am interested in buying the 1990's and I searched for a thread about it but didn't find any, since you own the 1990's if you could do a thread just like this one with a freq graph and all that jazz, that would be amazing! take your time with it and do it when you have the time :)
 
Top Bottom