zenon
Member
Come on, don't get it all done.Would have been quicker for you & me to link again.
Come on, don't get it all done.Would have been quicker for you & me to link again.
You just find another way to measure Mike and Bob: the weight.
And you can also measure their belly width with a ruler.
Now show me a measurement of your op amp rolling, and if possible the proof that it is audible.
another one of those audio voodoo believers who probably thinks his ears are somehow better at evaluating sound than state of the art measuring equipment
the hubris that people are capable of never ceases to amaze me
I would like you to think about the certification of USB cables and why it is needed.
P.S. We see that Bob is thicker than Mike, but it turns out that Bob weighs more than Mike... Why is that
Check mateYou just find another way to measure Mike and Bob: the weight.
Oh, well look at this, we have another Google engineer!
Are you also saying that OPA2134 and also OPA1612 shouldn't be used in I/V stage as their GBP is too low (8 and 11MHz)?
How about you and your buddy @777 read this post. Here is what it says:
"In all cases, even with the most expensive tester, you can't measure everything out of the box. For example, if you drop $30K on an a state of the art audio tester, you won't be able to even slightly detect the distortion of a modern $2 opamp like the OPA1612. In those cases, engineers have been forced to find ways to make a series of measurements that tease that performance out. For opamps, there are circuits such as "distortion magnifiers" (see TI OPA1612 spec for schematic) that will force the opamp to distort 100X more than normal. "
So much about OPA 1612, and OPA2134 for that matter, not being capable to do I/V conversion.
And this is based on what?
Another one who has read several reviews and imagines he has become hyper competent with this.
OK! Fine.Damn the analogies are almost too perfect to be true. If only we could verify someone's thickness, indeed! From freedictionary:
thick (thĭk)
Informal: Lacking mental agility. Hmm.
Check mate
I see different behavior of DAC with two different cables.
But if you like what Amir wrote, so be it.
Have you updated your firmware?
http://en.tpdz.net/wdzn_detail/newsId=84.html
Also, if you're using Windows 10 I suggest not to install the Topping drivers, but use the drivers that already come in Windows.
You are understanding this properly. If you want something in a similar price and performance range with coax and toslink inputs have a look at the recent SMSL M100 review.Am I understanding this properly ? This DAC has only usb input ? Coax and spdif can be ONLY used as an output ? There is no way to use coax and spdif to input the data ?
is there a difference on the gain between the RCA on this and say a SDAC-B's XLR?
? Why yes, 4Vrms output on XLR instead of 2Vrms on RCA. A difference of 6dB if I'm not mistaken.
Windows, right? Setting Windows sample rate will simply resample all windows audio to said sample rate, but Windows sucks at resampling; so don't simply select the highest rate, many think this is a good thing but it's more detrimental that not.Hey guys. Spent the past couple of days on different forums trying to figure things out but I'm so new to all this and haven't a clue so I probably missed things out while reading.
My first issue is that if I download the driver, I can only select up to 192khz but I'm able to hit 384khz without it.
The other thing is the bitrate on the display is fixed to whatever I set it to (192 right now) regardless of what file I'm playing or Spotify.
Would greatly appreciate the help.
Thanks in advance
Windows, right? Setting Windows sample rate will simply resample all windows audio to said sample rate, but Windows sucks at resampling; so don't simply select the highest rate, many think this is a good thing but it's more detrimental that not.
Most sources like spotify, YouTube, ... use 44Khz so safest is just to set it to 44 with max bit depth and be happy.
Movies are generally 48Khz but if you have a smart player like MPC-HC you can put on 'exclusive' mode which will automatically push the source sample rate. Smart audio players can also use WASAPI exclusive mode (or ASIO) to auto select source rate. And Windows will only fall back to the default in any other case, where 44Khz will generally be ideal...