The OP asked why any one would bother with vinyl playback when everything is available on streaming. My answer is because for many older titles the vinyl versions sound not only different but better because of both a fresher analog source and different styles of mastering. I thought by posting an example of the differences the OP could decide if it was something he would like to pursue. I have no illusions about the sound quality of vinyl vs digital all things being equal. The problem with many digital versions of old music is that both the original master tapes and the original machines were often worn out before the music ever got transferred to digital. It appears to me (by ABX testing) that a good vinyl pressing made from a fresh analog source will often times sound better than an old worn out analog source transferred to digital despite vinyls limitations. The problem is compounded when the old music is then "remastered" to both try to compensate for the lost information and to sound as loud as every other song being steamed. I wish there was a way to measure "musical information density" on a recording so we could objectively compare recording quality instead of just "that sounds better".
I've observed this often even between digital recordings of the same music, for example between the recording of a song played at a live concert from a fan uploaded soundboard tape transfered to flac vs the same song that got released commercially on a CD / audio streaming. The fan version totally blows the streaming / CD version out of the water, no comparison.