- Joined
- Apr 21, 2018
- Messages
- 428
- Likes
- 508
Anyone here have experience with the SugarCube from SweetVinyl:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/axpona-sweet-vinyl-sugar-cube.330/
https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/sweetvinyl-sugarcube-sc-1/
I don’t get why vinyl aficionados would want to digitize — doesn’t that beat the whole purpose of analog.
..”.As I mentioned before, the SC-1 works using algorithms in the digital domain. It is not frequency based. That is why it is so effective in removing the clicks and pops with minimal impact on the actual music. Other vinyl noise reduction devices I have encountered have relied on identifying frequencies or bands where the clicks and pops occur and then attenuating those frequencies. The problem with that approach is, along with the clicks and pops, some of the music also gets attenuated...”
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/axpona-sweet-vinyl-sugar-cube.330/
https://positive-feedback.com/reviews/hardware-reviews/sweetvinyl-sugarcube-sc-1/
I don’t get why vinyl aficionados would want to digitize — doesn’t that beat the whole purpose of analog.
..”.As I mentioned before, the SC-1 works using algorithms in the digital domain. It is not frequency based. That is why it is so effective in removing the clicks and pops with minimal impact on the actual music. Other vinyl noise reduction devices I have encountered have relied on identifying frequencies or bands where the clicks and pops occur and then attenuating those frequencies. The problem with that approach is, along with the clicks and pops, some of the music also gets attenuated...”