Beta Test: Multitone Loopback Analyzer software

[Sokel]

Ok,I did your way too with the new version:

Normal

The way I do it.

Your way,difference is that also reports infinite dbfs.



The difference as far as I can see is in noise.

Edit:Tried to replicate it in the same session without closing MT and I couldn't.
In only happens if I close and restart MT regardless if there is any history entry or not.
It also happens the same way with the history entries already in the history if restarted.

Edit 2:
Restarted PC too,just in case,same results.

Edit 3:
Tried with other devices too,it does the same,I include the exported file for you to see.

emu1.mth

1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world

we.tl

 

[pkane]

Ok,I did your way too with the new version:

View attachment 233331

Normal



View attachment 233332

The way I do it.



View attachment 233333

Your way,difference is that also reports infinite dbfs.



The difference as far as I can see is in noise.

Edit:Tried to replicate it in the same session without closing MT and I couldn't.
In only happens if I close and restart MT regardless if there is any history entry or not.
It also happens the same way with the history entries already in the history if restarted.

Edit 2:
Restarted PC too,just in case,same results.

Edit 3:
Tried with other devices too,it does the same,I include the exported file for you to see.

emu1.mth

1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world

we.tl

I don't see infinite level in my testing. Somehow the level was recorded as zero, but I don't seem to be able to get the same result.

The noise level difference after import and restart is interesting. Let me see if I can hunt it down.

 

[Sokel]

I don't see infinite level

No,I'm talking about the legend in the test I did your way,has the infinite sigh in front instead of -4.10dbFS (third pic).

 

[pkane]

No,I'm talking about the legend in the test I did your way,has the infinite sigh in front instead of -4.10dbFS (third pic).

I understand I don’t see this in my testing. Is this something you can reproduce?

 

[Sokel]

I understand I don’t see this in my testing. Is this something you can reproduce?

No,that is really random,I tried 10 times.
The interesting thing is that noise is going up constantly about 3-3.5db after the importing:
(that's the Xover)

normal

after importing.


Tried with different sample rates too,the same.

 

[pkane]

No,that is really random,I tried 10 times.
The interesting thing is that noise is going up constantly about 3-3.5db after the importing:
(that's the Xover)

View attachment 233343

normal

View attachment 233344


after importing.


Tried with different sample rates too,the same.

Let's try this one more time, if you can, please:

https://app.box.com/s/qbrh3czrvudclkqs9n8lm806k3hzmjx5

 

[Sokel]

Let's try this one more time, if you can, please:

https://app.box.com/s/qbrh3czrvudclkqs9n8lm806k3hzmjx5

Yep,you got it!
(and this one is fast!)

128 averages with quarter million FFT size would take me forever in previous version,now took 30sec!

 

[Sokel]

...and with a million watching every like spike of my super low noise PSU

(took 3 min,not possible before)

 

[pkane]

...and with a million watching every like spike of my super low noise PSU

View attachment 233382


(took 3 min,not possible before)

While measuring, try switching to the Waveform tab. See if you notice anything

 

[Blumlein 88]

Let's try this one more time, if you can, please:

https://app.box.com/s/qbrh3czrvudclkqs9n8lm806k3hzmjx5

I barely was able to run the last one. I'll try this one now.

 

[pkane]

I barely was able to run the last one. I'll try this one now.

Sorry, but I can't help it .. they break it as soon as I make it

 

[Sokel]

While measuring, try switching to the Waveform tab. See if you notice anything

Heeeey!We have real time waveform!
Thank you for that!

 

[Rantapossu]

Let's try this one more time, if you can, please:

https://app.box.com/s/qbrh3czrvudclkqs9n8lm806k3hzmjx5

Thanks!

Unfortunately none of the last versions got the history alignment completely right.

Right after the measurement:

Without restarting MT or exporting the measurement I just double clicked the last result from the "History" -window. It looks almost the same, but there's many differences (There's two red circles, but there is more than two slight differences):

When I select the same measurement at the "History" -window, the red line doesn't match the white line, but it looks a lot like the first picture:

Looks like that double clicking the measurement gives the wrong graph and ticking the box gives the right one to me...

 

[Rantapossu]

There's a selection bug too:

Nothing is selected on the history window:

After the click to the top label "21:42:21" (not the "Select" -tick box): The graph appears without asking and selection is still "off":

Clicking the next label, the previous line tick box activates and the next graph becomes visible:

And it continues and continues as long you click the label texts:

Clicking the color selector gives the same result, but the "Description" and "Time" doesn't do that. And "Select" of course does it, because it's supposed to do so...

 

[pkane]

There's a selection bug too:

Nothing is selected on the history window:

View attachment 233412

After the click to the top label "21:42:21" (not the "Select" -tick box): The graph appears without asking and selection is still "off":

View attachment 233418

Clicking the next label, the previous line tick box activates and the next graph becomes visible:

View attachment 233419

And it continues and continues as long you click the label texts:

View attachment 233420

Clicking the color selector gives the same result, but the "Description" and "Time" doesn't do that. And "Select" of course does it, because it's supposed to do so...

View attachment 233421

I've a great idea on how to fix all these problems! I'm going to remove the History feature

 

[Blumlein 88]

I've a great idea on how to fix all these problems! I'm going to remove the History feature

So the new guiding motto is "If I don't build it......they won't break it"?

 

[pkane]

So the new guiding motto is "If I don't build it......they won't break it"?

That seems more efficient than "if you build it, they'll come ... and break it!"

 

[Sokel]

That seems more efficient than "if you build it, they'll come ... and break it!"

 

[pkane]

There's a selection bug too:

Nothing is selected on the history window:

View attachment 233412

After the click to the top label "21:42:21" (not the "Select" -tick box): The graph appears without asking and selection is still "off":

View attachment 233418

Clicking the next label, the previous line tick box activates and the next graph becomes visible:

View attachment 233419

And it continues and continues as long you click the label texts:

View attachment 233420

Clicking the color selector gives the same result, but the "Description" and "Time" doesn't do that. And "Select" of course does it, because it's supposed to do so...

View attachment 233421

Alrighty then... Let's give it one more college try before I decide to completely rip out the History feature

https://app.box.com/s/qbrh3czrvudclkqs9n8lm806k3hzmjx5

I changed the behavior slightly (double click now only works on the description or time columns, since these are not editable, the other columns do whatever they'd normally do if you click on them twice).

 

[pkane]

This is what I have to deal with... Do you think I need an audiophile AC cord to help me?