Polk audio's OWM3 review.
Due to its unique structure, vertical orientation could not be measured.
The measurement was based on the middle point between Twitter and Woofer.
The impedance response.
There's something around 700 to 800 Hz.
Next, SPL/FR.
It is flat overall, except that 8k or later is emphasized.
The lower limit is 89.7 Hz (-6 dB) and 109.5 Hz(-3 dB).
Next, the directional data.
Next, the harmonic distortion.
There are quite a few second harmonic distortion found in the executive band.
And there's something unusual.
It was not found in the Woofer proximity measurement, but a similar form was found in the Twitter proximity measurement.
Next, the multi-tone test.
Next is the multi-tone distortion for each sound pressure.
Finally, the compression test.
I don't have a multi-channel system, and I don't have surround speakers either.
Therefore, you are not familiar with the properties of the ideal surround speaker.
What is your opinion after looking at these data?
Due to its unique structure, vertical orientation could not be measured.
The measurement was based on the middle point between Twitter and Woofer.
The impedance response.
There's something around 700 to 800 Hz.
Next, SPL/FR.
It is flat overall, except that 8k or later is emphasized.
The lower limit is 89.7 Hz (-6 dB) and 109.5 Hz(-3 dB).
Next, the directional data.
Next, the harmonic distortion.
There are quite a few second harmonic distortion found in the executive band.
And there's something unusual.
It was not found in the Woofer proximity measurement, but a similar form was found in the Twitter proximity measurement.
Next, the multi-tone test.
Next is the multi-tone distortion for each sound pressure.
Finally, the compression test.
I don't have a multi-channel system, and I don't have surround speakers either.
Therefore, you are not familiar with the properties of the ideal surround speaker.
What is your opinion after looking at these data?