• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Hifi Forum TDA-1541A DAC Review

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 95 48.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 67 33.8%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 26 13.1%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 10 5.1%

  • Total voters
    198

Azathoth

Active Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
112
Likes
255
...but at some point, the bodyguards might get too expensive :cool:

But seriously, one might be tempted to do this as DIY - like a Purifi amp build in a good old "Panzer Hi-Fi" case.
Hmm I'll include some NFT bullshit into it, get millions then disappear I suppose.
 

Wuzel

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
35
Likes
22
It's an highly 16 bit optimized DAC Chip for the Redbook CD Standard ....
Used in the famous CD-7.

But nothing that can compete with modern Chips. Better sounding...ohhh gosh.... the same shit as 'vinyl has better sounding', 'Cassette kill them all'....

The world seems broken :rolleyes:
 

martijn86

Active Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Messages
271
Likes
975
Location
The Netherlands

maybe some info here
The original design launched in 1985. That means that the chip was developed by Philips in the early 80's. In the context of that decade, it was quite a good chip. But why feel nostalgic of anything from the black box cassette tape is beyond me? For a celebratory product from a Hifi forum, I expected something more. I imagine an ASR special edition integrated amp would collaborate with Topping, Hypex and a SHARC DSP processor that takes speaker measurements from Amirm and produces several different targets of response.
 

capslock

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2020
Messages
316
Likes
145
There are some TDA 1547 (better known as DAC 7) kits out there, wonder how they perform by today's standards.

This is the "big" version with a TDA1307 for a modulator. Funny, I seem to remember the TDA1307 cannot work standalone, i.e. need a µC to set it up.

The TDA1547 is pure 1-bit, so should have minimal distortion but poor noise performance. When used in the small configuration with the SAA7350, it'll be even noiser because the SAA7350 has poorer stop band attenuation.
 

JEntwistle

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
127
Likes
133
This got me thinking.. If I just enclose a cheap usb DAC in a large and heavy metal case, and obscure it by placing decoy boards in it and sell it for 1000 smackers you'd think I can get very rich?

There was someone who did this about 10 years, but in a much worse way. They had put someone else's CD player inside their own case - literally a case within a case! I can't remember which brand it was, but it was something expensive, and they were caught out and shamed. I wish I could find the picture.
 

KSTR

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,690
Likes
6,012
Location
Berlin, Germany
Dithered 16bit data (as should be present on any competently mastered CD) has it's dither noise at ~90dBFS. No need for a 16bit DAC to have signficantly lower noise, nothing would be gained here.

This implementation is NOT limited by high'ish noise, there isn't. Distortion is also mostly below that noise brickwall as far as I would guess from the avaible data.
 

AudioTodd

Active Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Messages
193
Likes
278
For $388 one would expect some better performance for an external DAC, poor showing.

Happy mug panther is maybe too generous, but he is cool as. :cool:


JSmith
Gotta figure in the cost of the REAL chip too...
 

JEntwistle

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
127
Likes
133
There was someone who did this about 10 years, but in a much worse way. They had put someone else's CD player inside their own case - literally a case within a case! I can't remember which brand it was, but it was something expensive, and they were caught out and shamed. I wish I could find the picture.

Ah, found it!

image_preview2


It's a Blu-ray, actually. This is a Lexicon BD-30 with an Oppo BDP-83 inside. You can see from this picture of the bottom that they just re-cased it and cut ventilation holes.

The source of this is Audioholics from January, 2010:

There are more pictures in the article. The author noticed that the Lexicon's external layout looked very similar to the Oppo. First he opened the case, then he realized it was in fact the Oppo player just inside a new case!

Oppo retail price at the time: $499
Lexicon retail price at the time: $3,500

@Azathoth, you underestimated how rich you could get.
 

capslock

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2020
Messages
316
Likes
145
Dithered 16bit data (as should be present on any competently mastered CD) has it's dither noise at ~90dBFS. No need for a 16bit DAC to have signficantly lower noise, nothing would be gained here.

This implementation is NOT limited by high'ish noise, there isn't. Distortion is also mostly below that noise brickwall as far as I would guess from the avaible data.
Noise shaping dithering should allow much better than 90 or even 98 dB except in the top octave.
 

Mojo Warrior

Active Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
149
Likes
214
I must be out of the loop. Do I understand correctly that the appeal of this device is the “vintage” DAC chip? I ran across this description (source linked below):

The sonic characteristic of TDA1541A DAC players is very easy to distinguish - after hitting PLAY after trying other DACS you can hear a big difference immediately, BUT I can't describe it at all. It is very hard to put in words. The sound is very rich, full, mature, ripe, analogue, liquid, dynamic, and with huge macro dynamics. It has the best midrange, best treble and very very good bass.
The main difference is: that I like it more than any other DAC chip, it is so ear friendly.

:facepalm:



This confirms my suspicions of digital gear producing analog sound. I often read the virtues of antique DAC chips producing analog sound (original Sony Playstation console, etc) is they dumb down the source signal so much it is comparable to analog sound reproduction. With a corresponding loss of detail and clarity.
 

Wuzel

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
35
Likes
22
This confirms my suspicions of digital gear producing analog sound. I often read the virtues of antique DAC chips producing analog sound (original Sony Playstation console, etc) is they dumb down the source signal so much it is comparable to analog sound reproduction. With a corresponding loss of detail and clarity.

The same with Vinyl & Cassette Hype train....
Or tubes and stuff like that.

But - of course, there some interesting DAC Chips from elder days, that can be interesting because of some unique features or technical solutions.... Like some Wolfson Dacs, special the types for the prof. line (earlier DAT ADC/DAC sets...). I love the time domain optimized filter - measurements are not so great, but very unique sound shaping :)
 

tecnogadget

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
558
Likes
1,011
Location
Madrid, Spain
I must be out of the loop. Do I understand correctly that the appeal of this device is the “vintage” DAC chip? I ran across this description (source linked below):

The sonic characteristic of TDA1541A DAC players is very easy to distinguish - after hitting PLAY after trying other DACS you can hear a big difference immediately, BUT I can't describe it at all. It is very hard to put in words. The sound is very rich, full, mature, ripe, analogue, liquid, dynamic, and with huge macro dynamics. It has the best midrange, best treble and very very good bass.
The main difference is: that I like it more than any other DAC chip, it is so ear friendly.

:facepalm:


I can’t express how much embarrassed I secretly feel of drinking that old Lampizator Kool Aid a decade ago when measurements were simply not available as today.

I wish we get the chance to see a real production Lampizator DAC test-shamed-benched over here haha.
 

KxDx

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2019
Messages
347
Likes
672
Location
Tidewater Virginia
Ah, found it!

image_preview2


It's a Blu-ray, actually. This is a Lexicon BD-30 with an Oppo BDP-83 inside. You can see from this picture of the bottom that they just re-cased it and cut ventilation holes.

The source of this is Audioholics from January, 2010:

There are more pictures in the article. The author noticed that the Lexicon's external layout looked very similar to the Oppo. First he opened the case, then he realized it was in fact the Oppo player just inside a new case!

Oppo retail price at the time: $499
Lexicon retail price at the time: $3,500

@Azathoth, you underestimated how rich you could get.
But the R&D for the custom case-over-case had to be massive.
 

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,760
Likes
9,442
Location
Europe
This from another “audiophile” brand, same deal just a couple years earlier
Great; didn't knew about the Theta. I do wonder though how companies expect that they will not be caught cheating, and that it's almost guaranteed to destroy its reputation.
 

KSTR

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,690
Likes
6,012
Location
Berlin, Germany
Noise shaping dithering should allow much better than 90 or even 98 dB except in the top octave.
Sure, with extreme noise shaping you can get better results with bandwidth restriction of say 10kHz
Standard triagular dither then yields -92dB and the most agressive ones may reach -100dB.
This DAC's noise floor is about -94dB wideband and more like -96dB within that resctricted bandwidth.
IMHO the noise penalty can be said to be negligible and may limit performance only when you happen to play standard-dithered digital silence into a noise-wise flawless amp at full bore.
 
Top Bottom