Search results

Yes, as Mr Dernie has reminded us, anything below 2x the resonant frequency is rubbish anyway so don't waste any resources at all on sending it out into the system. <https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-courteous-vinyl-playback-discussion.34143/post-2336940>

Nice novelty gift??? Maybe for $23.70, not $237!

This is supposed to be easier to use <https://www.den4b.com/products/renamer>.

I was going to write something but just found this <https://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/> Worth a try?

OK. I'll see what I can come up with.

You could do it with a script. Do you use Mac, Linux, or Windows?

Good, much better than a folder for each CD.

You don't like this convention for track numbers in multiple CDs: 1-01 1-02 1-03 etc. for CD 1; 2-01 2-02 2-03 etc. for CD 2; ?

If you mean the turnover frequency, 10 Hz would be too low as that is where the cartridge/arm resonant peak is often centred. Ideally you want nothing at all below 20 Hz, which means in an analogue system you have to start at 30 or so. Here's a good example...

Yes, indeed (I did learned some of this stuff in a previous life ;-) ). (Just edited that because it might've given the wrong impression.)

Just to add that Mr Dernie has also been a highly regarded F1 engineer and designer!

There is no real signal down there anyway <https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/the-courteous-vinyl-playback-discussion.34143/post-2336940>.

That might apply if there was a shallow trough in the lower treble, but I think such a deep suck-out would make things sound odd, or just plain wrong.

Indeed. Normally with a pronounced resonance and distortion we would expect a peak but here we have a deep suck-out. If it was just one side I'd expect to find something loose somewhere but that can't apply here.

Thanks, I missed that!

Good to see, but it seems odd to omit the manufacturer's name from the title. I see that this can digitise RIAA phono. Would it be possible to measure that?

Oh dear, what have I started???!!!

Only in the USA does "peanut butter and jelly sandwich" not seem really weird. ;-)

I agree, but my point was a more general one, being that even the most objective measurements require some degree of interpretation.

The relative importance of different measurements can be a subjective call, e.g., one speaker might have a flatter FR but higher distortion than another but which is preferred?