Is there a tool, with which I can use the measurement results, as in the example of the isine 10, to create an EQ profile for the modified JM-1 target?
https://github.com/jaakkopasanen/AutoEq/tree/master/results/crinacle/711%20in-ear/Audeze%20iSINE%2010
980 €?
An unbeatable price for an LCD i4, I thought.
https://www.kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/highend-kabel-horus-effect-audio-fuer-audeze-lcd-i4-und-andere/2745344431-172-5274?utm_source=sharesheet&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialbuttons&utm_content=app_android
But no, they're selling a...
My Variations are on the way.
I would also like to try out the CP155. To what extent do these influence the tonality?
I also ordered these
https://hifigo.com/products/moondrop-spring-tips?pr_prod_strat=jac&pr_rec_id=a75b7f3fe&pr_rec_pid=7469243990255&pr_ref_pid=7022641414318&pr_seq=uniform
The DAC sounds exactly as I imagined it would. Extremely transparent.
But the cable is very flimsy.
Does anyone know where I can get a cheap alternative?
Ultimately, I don't have a better explanation.
And I just accept it as a given.
I use the best measurement results/presets that we have, and transfer them to the corresponding in-ears. But the journey doesn't end here. Because, as I said, I notice differences, which I then evaluate.
That's the difference between theory and practice.
There are many members, especially in the ASR, who are of the opinion, that once we've talked about the FR and distortion, everything has been said.
I obviously don't agree with that.
Yesterday I compared the FH3 with the FH5s. Both were...